1:74-F-00182•IN RE: Triax Company Patent Litigation
Gesamter Gesetzestext
rg
ico
§ 2
TQ NE
® h- : -
R33 — _
Date 9 a
8/2/74 MOTION & BRIEF ~~ The Triax Company -- w/certificate of service.
| Requested Transferee Forum: N,D, Ohio 1 Requested Transferee Judge: CJ Frank Battisti
] : -_ XT__QF TIME REQUESTED == by Conco Inc., for add'l 30 days. : 4 EXT. OF TIME REQUESTED -- by Otis Elevator Co., to & incl. 9/9/74
8/15/74 I EXT. OF TIME GRANTED -- to ALL PARTIESto & including 9/79/74 —=
— Notice to counsel. oT8 19/74 2 HARTMA ETA ABR ATOR “response To motion Ww STETTO STV S
8/30/74 = HEARING ORDER —=Setting A-1 through A-3 for hearing == Sep. 9724Boston, Mass.
9/6/74 13 f RESPONSE - Conco, Inc. w/cert. of service and exhibit No. 1
9 cui MEMORANDUM ——- OtisElevator Co. w/cert. of service9/12/74 § 5 TRIAX CO. REPLY BR WZCERT OF SERVICE ——
11/26/74 § I CONSENT OF CHIEF JUDGE BATTISTI FOR litigation to be handled in the
; N.D. OHII |
11/26/74 §& | OPINION AND ORDER transferring litigation to the N.D OHIO for coordinated
: _ or consolidated pretrial proceedings before Judge
Frank J. BAttisti pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S§140
8/18/7€ ORDER -- Assigning litigation to Judge John M. Manos under S140
| 1
—-
IIS ™ YI IFPFPIIIMIM i
rT
_ |
hn I —
{|
re
+]
[|] EE
| -
— -—
=
=
[| I =
|]
[|
IOPINION AND ORDER, NOWas@#lDl dims 18289 neyrr, FARD05/01/15 Page 2 of 3 Clos eoDOCKET NO. 182 -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Description of Litigation
/J2- IN RE THE TRIAX COMPANY PATENT LITIGATION
j Summary of Panel Action —
Date(s) of Hearing(s) 7 anf iDate(s) of Opinion(s) or Order(s)
Consolidation Orderegx Name of Transferee Judge afr J. Upriea
Consolidation Denied Transferee District NORTHERN DISTRICT OF RX OHIO Hr]
Intra-| District| Civil Date of
Office] and Action Transfer| Transferee [Dismissal
Number Caption Judge Number Date Docket No. [or Remand Misc.
A-1 The Triax Company v. TRW Inc. N.D.Ohio ie ; (gTriax Co. MotBattisti] C 73-820 ooo "
A-2 The Triax Company v. Otis N.D.Ohio JsElevator Company Battisti] C 74-528 — . i S. ¥I179 " "
| | = A/C - N A
A-3 - The Triax Company v. Conco Inc. N.D.Ill A. d797/¢7 - RE7, Cy oo AusTiV {74-C-2157 vse ry 4 " "
/Le cleo £ Cotta ee / avNy 19 7 -REY helt? SARS 2LNV2-
NVA as RAC IE emo
[Pat 1977 ~ (Ad — 2-7 soor & . :
Peles SEF AA . #4 # 3 ' 5 rr No a #1 a Cor”
| {le 817m 2 / 1 /A ; si 0 / y pe AL :
K ™N i } 4 £ a oe { ! ! Fi OQ A Si
i | | | Pa 3 ¥ oF|
|
| | | | |p. __ ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION | ® DOCKET NO. 382 -- _IN RE THE TRIAX COMPANY PATENT LITIGATIONESSENSE SR SE Se Plaintiff Defendant THE TRIAX COMPANY TRW INC. Richard J. Egan, Esquire B. Edward Shlesinger, Esquire Baldwin, Egan, Walling & Fetzer Shlesinger, Fitzsimmons & Shlesinger ® 1430 Keith Building Suite 1323, Alliance Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115 183 E. Main Street : Rochester, New York 14604 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY Joseph L. Sharon, Esquire c/o Otis Elevator Company 750 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 CONCO INC. Stanley C. Dalton, Esquire Wegner, Stellman, McCord, Wiles & Wood Rm. 2200 -- 20 N. Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.