IN RE: Advertising Rate Antitrust Litigation

Case MDL No. 116 Document 2 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 2
TT - co — — —
| x
14: JU, Daa | . : }
MeL pe oT. ERE a A
ERS ~ |
oo BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGETION Co co RE- & | {2 : RE RAS -. GT LL
. PAT er, qi |b bs : : t ~ =: DOCKET NO. 116 -- IN RE ADVERTISING RATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION / boo EE
. f= an p72 4 Le	. : vf
ORDER Co
It appearing that prior to the Panel hearing in the E Lo
above-captioned litigation a stipulation for transfer of the se Ca SR
action pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to the EE Sh
Southern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. §l404(a) was SI C0
agreed to by the parties, that subsequent to said hearing such LL EE Lo
transfer was ordered by the Honorable Louis Charles Bechtle : : Co
of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and that, therefore,
. the statutory criteria for transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
: §1407 no longer exist, :
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for transfer under EE .
28 U.S.C. §1407 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. a RR
: FOR THE PANEL: EAE
ez P. Murrah - LoChairman : Co

Case MDL No. 116 Document 2 Filed 04/30/15 Page 2 of 2
8 > . Co
) SCHEDULE A DOCKET NO. 116
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
National Auto Brokers Corp., et al. v. Civil Action
General Motors Corp., et al. No. 70 Civ. 5421
Times Square Associates and Ira Jay Sands Civil Action
v. New York Times Co., et al. No. 72 Civ. 3515
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Ambook Enterprises v. Time Inc., et al, Civil Action
No, 72-1058
@
i
1
|
Hl