IN RE: Rusco Industries Litigation

Case MDL No. 85 Document 2 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 2
-" ) . ~ i .
] : DOCKET NO. 85 BC	15 iro
or , EE Lo )
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION. ( =
IN RE RUSCO INDUSTRIES LITIGATION
ORDER
It appearing that all of the actions on the
attached Schedule, pending in other districts, have been
transferred to the Central District of California under
28 U.S.C. §1404 (a);
x IT IS ORDERED that the hearing order of
September 29, 1971 be and the same is hereby VACATED. |
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for consolida-
) tion under 28 U.S.C. §1407 be and the same is herebyDENIED as moot.
| wT FOR THE PANEL: |
~ A \ N
- - | fei P. Murrahoo Chairman

Case MDL No. 85 Document 2 Filed 04/30/15 Page 2 of 2
SCHEDULE _A. © DOCKET NO. 85
| NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Harry Marcus, et al. v. Rusco Industries, Inc., Civil Action
et al. No. 71 C 1608
"CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA :
Andrew Benexrofe wv. Jack Catain, Jr., et al. Civil Action
: No. 71 = 1608
Edward Hubner, et al. v. Rusco Industries, Inc., Civil Action No.
Froma Benerofe v. Jack Catain, Jr., et al. Civil Action' No. 71 - 1609
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Bernard Mills v. Rusco Industries, Inc., et al. Civil Action
: No. 71 Civ. 3243
Abraham H. Angstreich v. Rusco Industries, Inc., Civil Action .-.
et al. No. 71 Civ. 2866
@pcanan H. Angstreich v. Rusco Industries, Inc., Civil Action	et al. No. 71 Civ. 2867