1:71-F-00079•IN RE: King Resources Company Securities Litigation
Gesamter Gesetzestext
4 |
I B \
1 oY~ oo
® H- :
- RD '
Date Q
7730/71
] actions to the District of Colorado. Certificate of service
CC] and appendices attached. (0&9
8/6/71 | 2 | DEFENDANT (KING RESOURCES] BR N~ SUPPORT OF MOTION TO TRAN R
8/9/71 STODDARD H. PYLE, (P) Response to motion to transfer / dey ~ C- §7% =
8/9/71 4| HAROLD BOTTGER (P) Answer to motion to transfer and memo.
8/13/71 LEONARD GROSS ET UX ANSWER TO MOTION TO TRANSFER and MOTION to dismiss
1 w/certificate of mailing
8/24/71 |J HEARING ORDER - Setting A-1 through .A-9 for September 24, 197, Washington,
| ID. C., Notified Counsel, involved judges.
8 1] ipplemental certificate of mailing from defendan King Resources
| {Y Ywi cetki{ficatelof sérvice.
8/16/71 Statement on position of the Securities and Exchange Commission
9/10/71 7. Response of Blyth & Co., Ine., Getz, Morris, Hill and Staley opposing
| | transfer . w/certificate of service. (Krcef ow 43)
9 3 1 | econd pplementa S ificate © e ice om RothgEerbe
9 3. | Motion Q 3 3 imited Notice of Qppoasition om San anci Q
| nvestment Corp ane ohn i 3 i ord Hector Munro
9 EN Motion and Memorandum OQ imoth On o add cageMorre King
9/16/71 | | Supplemental certificate of mailing from defendant SERIF RGE
[|] San Francisco ve © orp ame ohn : FEE ied Ilan
Muno for Mailing of Motion to tay and Limited Noticé of Or Tia
9/17/71 MORELL (P) Response Opposing Transfer
9 11 Lb i R P Response onno 1 Na ansfe —
9/20/71 FVi1>| AMENDED RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFFS GROSS TO MOTION TO TRANSFER FILED
] AVY KING RESOURCES AND RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFFS GROSS TO MOTION
Q MOTH OWRY RO
9/21/71 | | ORDER VACATING 8/24/71 HEARING ORDER. Notified Counsel.
9/29/71 |J HEARING ORDER - October 29, 1971, San Francisco Calif. ... .
| ] Setting A-1 through A-10. Notified Counsel, involved Judges.
| || Letter from defendant Raff advising no desire to appear before the
he the Panel; waiving notice of hearing and service of papers; and
he consenting to any panel actions that deems appropriate.
|] Orde 0 Show Cause and Notice of Hearing (Oct. 29, 1971, San. —
| [| ancisco ali entered today Notified counsel and involved
[ dge
0/13/71 | JCORRECTION ORDER TQ 9/29 HEARING ORDER = Reference to D alifornia|] in third paragraph deleted and "District of Colorado" inserted
10 7 [13J RESPONSE OF PLTF. DIETRICH CORP., ET AL. TO SCO.
11/5/71 | 1 HEARING ORDER setting A-1 through C-2 for hearing 12/8/71 Phoenix, Ariz.
11/5/71 |J SHOW CAUSE ORDER ~- Neary v. 10S, Ltd. et al., N.J. 235-71 and
: I SEC v. Crofter, Inc., S.D. Ohio 70-2X 351 - Notified counsel, involved
1 judges.
11/16/71 § JS.E.C. v. Crofters, inc., S.D. Ohio, 70-351
| LC] Letter REguest from plaintiff for an extension to 11/24/71 to
| respond to SCO. plaintiff onl
] ORDER - granting extension tofand including 11/24/71 to file and
[ serve response to SCO. Notified counsel
|Flavin RANK £ TR nr , Response to SCO in Neary.
11/23/71 | 12. JPLTF. WILLIAM D ARY, Response to SCO hporting Affidawvi hibits
18. pEF. 1.0.S., LTD., Response to SCO in Neary (w/brief)
|] :
| -ro
Zh
So >; 2 |RE
Date Qa So
11/22/71 J1&| Response of def. David R. Kerr
|15| Response of defenda i i
I — ponss once ants. Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc. and Harry A. /71 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COT SELON Temes th S00 wT sort
| 0 BEY Fie response to SCO w/cert. of service- Dee Ey ®) Regen 3 cptance Q e d A D
| dn Griffith and Harry A. Groban (defendants) response to11/29/71 B 0% Cc date oO e ay Fp
: : OILonE response to SCO (New Jersey action)1276/71 23 NARD GROSS. AND HELEN GROSS = mot] i
. JACK L. CLARK - Memo in opposition to moti “for consolidati ” eruics12/8/71 of service Lon for consolidation w/c |J Consolidated Oil and Gas, I
| certificate of serv g Inc. 2nd Harry A. Trushloo Fhpplansnta
13 - ice. I _ = csponse oO Ai iam B eg i
12/15/71 Morrell Action. iB Murray Legarding frass Action-andit upplemental Brief of Willi ‘ . =! D Neg A .
‘12/16/71 J25 II TRIE Co... opposing transfe a/ce nf service12/20/71 §26] Statement © ~ Char rr py Hoppa; Ldn £9 sources - :] Certificate of Mall The 2 frrustee, Sin REsourc¢es Co., Seb or|J and Opinion of Special Counse Thom on BS oes
[J Complaint in Gross Case No F : in SEC Sasej first Amended[Morrell Case (filed @ ; pe THe I°c file date): Complaint I i in e Deitrich Corp. Case ] n Licker
|J Amended Complaint in Bottger Case ( ER : TT
[| [Data Relations Case (file BALLS Lat Complaint in Financia
— {Case (filed 8/28/70; and Compla Comp aint in Delafield Capita orp.
— ta case (Filed 3/9771 plaint in Mercantile Bank & Trust Co.12/27/71 Additional Statement of Charl ry :
| - Debtor in re Neary v. I 55 Fy frustee, King Resources Lo. ] ertificate o al Tat TT
——— ing for Statement & Add Staement.
XK NT _CHTF DGE_ARRA OR. JUDGE SHERMAN FINESTLVER TO handle— 2 he ®, Q1L0 AC) ®. 00 dina cd CJ QJ) @, 1da 0
4 | lop NTON AND ORDER RAN RR
— OORDTNA DOR ONSO DA — on i > . > 2 QLORADQ OR iN a IS 2 PR [\ ald 0 B n_& A
ecard Grose vw Rlyth £ Go.DOradon,Cho action te 0A Ahn M re ND - — A On 342 Nolorado
| 4 icke King Reso o SPO - Lan Na = =40
ie ere Bh - 0 NLD a ~71-882-RH
] - AP Nd 0 D) Oregon -200¢0 :
eon win aU pra aadeeeee
1 nan a Data Relati
EE RS PR PLng-Hesourcesta 2d
1] Nea 0 @ », N -
[|] 4 Delafield apita King Re =
| ] D1 ib ion made inp — _— ' n Q.LOXAdO NO /= grdance na QP TINTON and QRDER
TH = = —DAA A — = WVD.C.110Rev.CivilDocketContinuation 3 _& iDate Order or DATE PROCEEDINGS Judgment Noted 6/12/7 STATE OF OHIO V. CROFTERS, INC., ET AL. » S.D.OHIO, 72-138 25 Motion of Arthur Andersen & Co. to transfer action pursuant to | 28 U.S.C. §1807 to the District of Colorado memo, arfidavit “of service. ______._ 6/12/72| ROBERT HILL, ET AL. V. ARTHUR ANDERSON CO., ET AL., OREGON, 72-356 ) CTO entered today. Notified counsel, involved judges. 6/16/72 ROBERT HITIL, ET AL. V. ARTHUR ANDERSON. CO,, ET AL. , OREGON ~356 27 | Motion of william V. Coffey (attorneys) for consolidation of SE action, Brie ertificate of service. ~~ _ 6/19/72 LICKER V. KING RESOURCES CO., N.D. CALIF., C-71-882 oo oo _ 3 Plaintiffs motion forseverance and remand w/affidavit and brief _ and certificate ofservice. - 756/72] HILL V. ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., ET AL., OREGON, 72-356_ ] NOTICE OF OPPOSITION from defendants Boone, Lawrence, Rauth _ Silberman w/cert. of service , G CTO. Notified Counse 6/29 ORDER ST HOR ANDERSEN & CO. Oregon 72-356 oT oT K NOTICE OF OPPO ON from plaintiffs w/certiticate © ervice 7/5/72 HEARING ORDER, July 28, 1972 hearing in Denve olorado Notified judges involved; counsel involved 371772 MOTION TO VACATE, BRIEF, defendants, Byron,V. Boone, Harding a 33 L. Lawrence, J. Donald Rauth, and David B. Silberman, J w/certificate of service _ = / 7/13/72 MOTION OF PLTS. ROBERT HILL, ET AL. V. ARTHUR ANDERSEN & 0 3 to vacate CTO concurred with (defs.) Boone, Lawrence, Rauth _ and Silberman, in support of this motion w/cer 0 er vice (one copy) LL 7/24/72 | HILL, et al., V. ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., ET AL. 3 MEMORANDUM - of Arthur Andersen & Co., (defs.) in support of CTO w/attorney service list 7/24/72 | STATE OF OHIO V. CROFTERS, INC., ET A D. _QHIQ -138 AC Motion ®or an extension of time - instante transfer 7/26/72 Exhibit D attached 0 Memo of ne ate oO Ohio in apposition 3/ | to transfer J8/3/72.| STODDARD H. PYLE V. ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO AL. D. Qrg -5 3%| Motion of James D. Tocher for an orde ansferring action to _ Colorado w ertificate o ervigce 7/28/72 | STATE OF OHIO V. CROFTERS, INC., S.D.OHIO 72-138 === 71 Coffey filing position statement - FILED IN OPEN COURT 8/11/72 STODDARD H. PYLE V. ARTHUR ANDERSON _& CO. A YO Motion of William V. Coffey for Section 1407 transfer to e 8/14/72 STODDARD H. P ARTHUR ANDERSON & CO A — Motion of Rowland Boucher and Brief for Section 1407transfer to olorado ce of service 9 2 QDDARD H D ARTHUR _ANDERSON _& CO ETAT y HEARTNG ORDER = OCT. 4, 19 NEW_ORLEANS, LA. Nétified counsel 9 9 A QDDARD PYLE AR [IR ANDERSON. -& 0 E AT, _ 42 A : Andersen & Co CORCY ing ith 3 motions ilad o and fe 9 0 2 STODDARD MH. PYLE . ARTHUR, ANDERSEN & CO., AL. Boone, Lawrence, Rauth & Silberman opposing motions in this action. 10/2/72 STODDARD H. PYLE V. ARTHUR ANDERSON, ET AI 7 Supplemental memo of Aurthur Andersen & Co. & Oscar T. Leverenz]
| DATE | PROCEEDINGS BeiiadbecivlfY0/5772 | TICKER V. RING RESOURSES, D. COLO, C-398T |= #4 ifs Notice ofplaintiff's motion to separate and retransfer plaintiffs claims to N.D. Calif. (filed In the D. © olorado MD 9= 10/10 ROBERT HILL V. ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., OREGON, 72-356 — TT | STODDARD H. PYLE V. ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., OREGON; = TT Order - transferring actions to RXRXXBX D R 0 OLORADOU | and assigning to JUDG N VER Pursuan © 28 U.S.C. §I407 o Notified transferee, transferor judges & €rKk, counsel and ~hearing cler “10/716 7? STATE OF OHIO V. CROFTERS, S.D. OHIO, NO. 72-138 A Def. Arthur Andersen & Co., ltr. of 10/13/72 to Panel members advising discovery 1s about to proceed and asking expedited ~~ decision to transfer aboue case to Colorado. CH 11/2/72] LICKER V. KING RESOURCES CO., COLORADO C-3981, N.D. Ca. C-71-8820RHE OPINION AND ORDER remanding claimsthird, fourth, sixth and eights to the N.D. & California. IL STATE OF CHIO V. CROFTERS, INC., ET AL., .D.OHIO -133 NTO AND ORDER Transferring action to the District of Colorado and assigning to Judge Sherman G. Finesilver for consolidated dr coordinated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §140 3577 — J7_|__JUDGE FINESILVER ltr requesting remand of above action w/SnCLOSUrEs 4/9 _ Remand of all of Counts I, II and IV of plaintiffs first cause [of | action; all of Counts III and I of plaintiffs second cause of adtion; | and that portion of count IIT of the First Cause of Action and that portion of Count II of the Second cause of action which relates |solely to plaintiffs’ alleged claims against defendants Blyth & Co., ) Remand Order final today. Notified clerks and judges. 6720/74 / 4%) NOTICE OF OPPOSITION == A. Rowland Boucher filed today. | ~~ ORDER = Staying CTO of Jun 20, 1974. Notified counsel, involved | 9/74 | (49) State of Bhio v. A. Rowland Boucher, S.D. Ohio C-2-74-I173 8/13/74 | (50) RESPONSE -- State of Ohio to Boucher Motion to Vacate CTO Ww/CPEE, Of Svc. 8/30/74 | HEARING ORDER —— Setting State Gf Ohio action for hearing, Sep: 27; 1971 9/2 27/74 'v/?»y hearing ~~ 000000000000- © : a NSN NN] ~~. NS
JPMIL, FORM 1A - Continuation A DOCKET EHTRIES ~- pe. 5 Nocras NO. 79 ——- IN RE KING RESOURCES COMPANY SECURITIES LITIGATION No. Date Code 6/78 | | SUGGESTION OF JUDGE FINESILVER -- E-3 Stoddard H. Pyle v. Arthur IR Andersen & Co., et al., #C-4486 -- SUGGESTS REMAND TO D. OREGON (cds) 1/6/78 | | E-3 Stoddard H. Pyle v. Arthur Andersen & Co., et al., #C-4486, Co] CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER FILED TODAY -- NOTIFIED COUNSEL & Judge (cds 1/23/78 | | E-3 PYLE V. ARTHUR ANDERSON & CO., ET AL., D. COLO. C-4486 LC CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER FINAL TODA. Notified Involved Judge Co] and Clerks (rew) 5/26/78 | | SUGGESTION FOR REMAND -- E-2 -- State of Ohio v. Crofters, Inc.,et al., |] D., Colorado, C. A. No. C-4628 ) lL] E-4 —-- State of Ohio v. A. Rowland Boucher, D. Coktorado, C.A.# | 75-F-573 LC from Judge Finesilver in the D. Colorado and related correspondence ] rom counse or State of Ohio. ea 6/18 C ORDER TO OW CAUSE REGARDING REMAND -- E-2 -- State of Ohio wv. CO] rorters, lInc., et al., D. CO., C.A.#4628 ] —2 ate of Ohio v. A. Rowland Boucher, D. Co., C.A.#75-F-573 | —— Notified involved counsel, judge and clerk. ea 6/9/78 RESPONSE -- Dun & Bradstreet -- to Order to Show “Cause on remand lo w/cert. of svc. (ea) 5 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF REMAND (E-2) —-- Arthur Andersen & Co. w/cert. FC of svc, ea 0 8 [24] RESPONSE, EXHTIE] , CERT. OF SVC. -- Plaintiff State of Ohio -- to | order to show cause regarding remand. (ea) 6/20/78 REPLY/MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF REMAND -- Arthur Anderson & Co. -- | w/cert. of service (cd 6/20/78 REPLY TO STATE OF OHIO's RESPONSE -- Defendant Dun & Bradstreet -- ] w/Exhibit A and Cert. of Service (cds) 6/29/78 | | HEARING ORDER -- Setting (E-2) State of Ohio v. Crofters, Inc., et al., D. Colorado, No. 4628 and (E-4) State of Ohio v. A. Rowland Boucher, IE ly. Olorado, NO. —=F- FO Nearing regard Og REMAND UNDER 28 U.S.C. | §1407 X¥X®EXin Los Angeles, Calif. on July 28, 78 (cds 7/13/78 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF PLAINTIFF STATE OF OHIO -- w/cert. of serv. (cs 7/17/48 SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY MEMORANDUM -- Arthur Andersen & Co. w/cert of svc. (ea 7/24/78 | | HEARING APPEARANCES -- JULY 28, 1978 HEARING LC M M RSH Q R 0 ate of Ohio Lo H. THOMAS COGHILL, ESQ. for Arthur Andersen & Co. |] ELBERT J. KRAM, ESQ. for Dunn & Bradstreet Company 4 S CC WAIVERS OF ORAL ARGUMENT FOR JULY 48, 978 HEARING FEW es HAROLD A, FEDER Waiving for W. V. Coffe9/13/78 Co] OPINION AND ORDER -- Remanding E-2 Ohio v. Crofters, et al., | A. No. C=4628 and E=4Ohio v. A.RowlandBoucher, ] CA NO. == Ld 2 U “Ds 6 ne == INU t ed [|
——— 2. :
Lorre) arid Listes Aas 119723120 fF dan ©zgre) andl ste) AR. 8, 972 553 ff DTT 79
a Aen. Wd Le) HW. 191978 FEAF dp, 975"oC DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION '°
Tipe gar ond [Ligeed [lib R774 3ES ;7 fr 3EE
in ian § Or da [137 PuderpDescription of Litigation Choe B04. 20D Cerle JOB
Pi v_ 1.9L poe 0 Big . ree 7 y i oo } 4 SORE
SERITIES © | CLA Re
IN RE KING RESOURCES COMPANYALITIGATION ( Z 2 y J
2 y =
NO. CAPTION D.C. NUMBER] JUDGE DATE MISC.
A-1 Leonard Gross, et ux. v. WD Fosbivces | oregon lo §7//7 id percom ®, ct al. Petlaen) lacs a> 70-751 = WE Er/Ee Uk 73,
A-2 Stoddard H. Pyle v. KR. Fonda don ) pragon ) ZU (al® Gempany, et al. i 771-9997 J |
A-3 54 Robert Z. Staley Vv. Plein ‘oxedon / Co wril,—et al. 708695 BN
sos , "a £77 ) $7406)A-4 Harold Bottger, et al. v. King _ _ o,.0 TSRY Nb wend 23/02
Resources Company, et al. = sy 3 Ni \F/33/72—
A-5 4} Financial Data Relations ,EE. Vv. 7g C.D Calif. yrs”): .C yo etal. or 7X=-1096~DWY
oR 7H 80 EGER erm7, u / pn)= A-6 Donald J. Licker, et al. v. King N.D. Calif. 4 15 1472 | ~ ya -
RA Company, et Arr mata 71x74 C-71-882 70 (TFC
A-7 Securities and Exchange Commission Ys. Lalorade i olf King Resources Company, et al. C-2858 fchilsod™ ]
A-8 x] Delafield Capital Corpogxation v. Xing ~Colofado |. - QUT /
{ Resources Company, Ech C2824 / SEN
R TTT ~~ ’ } A
A-94} Mercantile Bank & Trust Company, Ltd. wv, Ccdlarado I FR WTwh
King Resources Company ) 42959 / Le Te |
B-1 Stoddard H. Pyle, v. The Wolf Corp., Oregon | Lon AAU et al. 70-693 | WP) laat~B-2 Robert W. Hill v. The Wolf Corp., et al. J Oregon: WIT (4 — Ph EGON | - ) 70+694 | ee -
| B-3 Arthur J. Lewis v. The Wolf Corp., Oregon 70 695et al. 70-696 ]
2d 2z f—<F
-@~ Joseph N. Morell, et ux v. John M. King, | N.D. Ohio VIG S17 SBR)J et al Ra =B0& Krupangk Fel 3
\ p Y A La 7039/ :
w C-1 The Dietrich Corporation, et al. v. King Colorado NPT AN / Sc O : 3
Resources Company, et al. TTT C342 TT [= ; “Soffa b| = 3DOCKET NO. 79
DOCKET =~- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
0 Description of Litigation
IN RE KING RESOURCES COMPANY SECURITIES LITIGATION
DISTRICT & TRANSFER
NO. CAPTION D.C. NUMBER} JUDGE DATE MISC.
Se .
D-1 1 William D. Neary, etc. v. IOS, Lodi . [Ay J. rl J, 4 157"
D-2 J Securities & Exchange Commission x., a £5 io SZ
C Crofters, Inc., et al. il ik RY J 70-351 \ __ Rubin Ve WE 4
* E-1 |Robert Hill et %; v. pred fofectst a 47 Dhl JUS Company & 2/7 2 JZTHEAPES & Lh —) 72-356 0, 93 IN<
Lobe : 4
ye? State of Ohio v. Crafters, Imc., et al.-|S.D. Ohisc 78 alr 77 74 4e 2onio : BAY — 9 N
. Pe No ME wi wT en PV TEA Sc
f er re . JorTAL 2
xX E-3 Stoddard H. Pyleg -ALN phd se * (~ Adr¥go IN BST naa iCo., et al., MALT T/E/7 ; 72-525 AAA ER A
- io, S J fo) 6 F§/fs x«\E-4 JiState of OhigQ v ROY 7 Boucher /onioy a: LA 7 75 fs 73
: Ld Op476. nd can ue] ?— Perret lne | . Go oT v7 Cy Lo gr » oF sn far
Cz Zz Ll 7 anrast7 #7 J rd a - /ax 70 AN pa So TT / eo ”
EN ta SE :
Pa¢ f°SSE he (50. A = 3
v rg / Pa .
{ 3 R / 5 LASR go |
| 7 Loafers
® |... i |/ v4 : ; 5 . Le
¢ ~ y = - an 2a
fel4 /77 mS Ao ey LO ) =y 7 A 7 B 4 ’ i / pa
} y oo . . Fedoidd
2, ey JA we JA 7
? y “} - . ~ A 7 , . ) Ey; _ i" Stes if. Pp. 1 ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ; C DOCKET NO. 79 -- King Resources Company Securities Litigation t Plaintiff Defendant ATTORNEY LIST USED BY JUDGE FINESILVER AND CLERK' OFFICE IN COLORADO o A-1 Leonard Gross, et ux. v. Blyth & Co.], Inc., et al. Lead Counsel Co — | Wins on J. Chur¢hill, Jr., Esquire King Reeources y Sauls Ewing, Refick of saul tas, "| John M, King230% Packar ilding (leg 22 2 A. Rowland Boucher Philadelphia, Pennsylvania pe» Timothy Lowry' oF John L. Schwabe, Esquire Wil}iam/B ryay) LANGE Rowland F. Banks, Jr., Esquire 70 retin 2 ie ) Mlecans Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey, Williamson Pgrtland, Oreg 2 & Schwabe - Standard Plaza Hopper and Kanouff Portland, Oregon 2418 Prudential Plaza Vv 1050 Seventeenth Street illi a Fis o, Esquire | ,.0 Denver, Colorado 80202 deri Li Building Penyvér, orado’ 80202 Blyth & Company Reuben Getz Thomas Morres : Robert Staley ad 24 yz Wapne—mritrard—PFsquire [rtLeigh D. Stephenson, Esquire o McColloch, Dezendorf, Spears, & Lubersky 800 Pacific Building : Portland, Oregon 97204 DUN & BRADSTREET, INC. Bruce G. Lynn, Esq. Bricker, Evatt, Barton & Eckler 100 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215
p. _2 Plaintiff Defendant A-4 Harold Bottger, et al. v. King Resoprces Company, et al. Eugene W. Landy, Esquire . + Regency Management C 125 Wyckoff Road ” The Denver Corporation Eatontown, New Jersey 07724 Imperial American Management . William G. Sumners, Esquire r L. Radey, Edquire Ait 1600 Broadway SN gqu\ tab < Rude [fe i het Denver, Colorado 80202 Dendtvek, Yol&rad 8020 Trustee of King Resources Co., Inc. John S. Pfeiffer, Esquire 1900 Security Life Building Denver, Colorado 80202 Trustee for Frison, Trustee of ®Imperial American Theodore H. Frison, Esquire : Philip G. Dufford, Esquire 1100 Denver U. S. Center ~~] 1700 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203 Myer Feldman J. L. Burke Stanley C. Hope Arthur J. C. Underhill Grover E. Murray - Ernest/W. Lohf, Es re Neleerntdl 1203 Ets Kasia 3 uilding Derfver’, L0lofa 0 Paul D. Bagwell George C. Hardin | Marvin R. Barnett Paul W. Fairchild Edward R. Annis, M. D. David E. Meldeny Charles F. McCoy | Royal Resources Corp. CRoyal Resources Exploration Inc. | C. Henry Roath, Esquire Charles F. Brega, Esquire ~~ 2301 First National Bank Building Denver, Colorado 80202 Arthur Young & Co, Dawson, Nagel, Sherman & Howard “1.1900 First National Bank Building Denver, Colorado 80202 White & Case o. | 14 wall Street , | New York, New York 10005
. p. _3 ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST | JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION C DOCKET NO. 79 -- King Resources Company Securities Litigation (Continued) Plaintiff Defendant ARTHUR ANDERSEN & COA-4 ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CX. A-4 (Continued) H. Thomas Coghill, Esq. Coghill, Goodspeed & Horowitz C 1600 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80202 BN Wilson & McIlvaine , }-135 Ss. LaSalle Street “| Chicago, Illinois 60603 Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross Isham, Lincoln & Beale (__}.1 First National Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60670 . Margaret” Bate igon : 9 rs Nagfigra)”B PG epfer/ Codoxrad 202 Ginsburg, Feldman & Bress MacLeay, Lynch, Bernhard & Gregg Lv Commonwealth Building Washington, D. C. Harold Taft King, Esquire : 1400 Petroleum Club Building [ . Denver, Colorado 80202 Walter M. Schirra, Jr. Pend law; ey 1s Uni sity Buirdi enter, lorade”, 2 # A-6 Donald J. Licker v. King Resources Co.,|No. C-3981 —— Ea n / i. O'Brjen, , unin, AFrazi 5 gal sey Igagrsen cosenbh, 4 Goldberg, P. C.- One/ Cali nig” Stree, Suit 2835 51@ United Bs ig CetteSdn Fraficisc6, California 94111 - Bor eglorado ‘80262 @:: Murphy, Esquire Yale Smulyan, Esquire 931 Union Street 220 Bush Street, Suite 1616 t © San Francisco, California 94123 p San Francisco, California 94104 Kennedy, Bloom, Fletcher & Kaufman ol 150 Post Street ~~} San Francisco, California 94108
Ps. 4 ~¥ y WF Plaintiff Defendant \ A-6 (continued) EEN SEIS ANA So- 433\Calrfornia Strewt ONC San Franc mie Stes ia 104 CAlbert L. Boasberxrg, Esquire Alexander Bulding, Suite 1500 \ + 155 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 'Byxne and Bed HG nassus Avenue) i 5 . San angisco,~Californ 1 A-10 - Joseph N. Morell, et ux v. John M| King, et al., No. C. 3980 ®Lead Counsel King Resources Winston J. Churchill, Jr. (Same As A-1) Robert E. Dippo, Esquire Associate General Counsel for King Resources Spangenberg, Hasenflue, Shibley & Traci Security Life Building 1500 National Bank Building Denver, Colorado 80202 Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Timothy G. Lowry n ™\ Gray, quire Caddie i James E. Laurenson, Esquire 61 I: ss aliding No 5 nal) Arter and Hadden ; Portland, Oregon = 97201 1144 Union Commerce Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115 William B. Murray, Esquire (Same As A-10 James E. O'Halloran, Esquire } Hopper and Kanouff (Same as A-1) Arter and Hadden LT1144 Union Commerce Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115 C-1 -- The Dietrich Corp. v. King Resoufces Co., et al., No. C-3424 Winston J. Churchill, Jr. (Same as A-1) | King Resources . - John S. Pfeiffer, Esq. (Same As A-4) C Eugene, F. Waye, E quir 1 oo i I saf?, Being seni . § paul Wipliam, Fy Grevey FEsquij oo 15 ral ek Uf Bteskts 100 /Bedtrdty Li £ Batiding vl Philadelphia, Pa. 19102 Denxtér, Colorado 780202 George W. Hopper, Esquire Arthur Andersen & Co. Robert S. Graft, Esquire Richard H. Shaw, Esquire . Hopper and Kanouff 1700 Broadway, Suite 1520 ; + 2418 Prudential Plaza Denver, Colorado 80202 “ 1050 Seventeenth Street : Denver, Colorado 80202 Wilson & McIlvaine (Same as A-4) ®
} Pp. 5
ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST
JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
C DOCKET NO. 79 -- King Resources Company Securities Litigation = (Continued)
-
Plaintiff Defendant
C-1 (Continued) David B. Silberman,
Louis E. Beckman
Byron V. Boone
o Frank Borman John T. Fallon :
Harding D. Lawrence
J. Donald Rauth
Berge, Martin & Clark
- ‘James A. Clark, Esquire
{1 300 Capitol Life CenterDenver, Colorado 80203
Royce H. Savage, Esquire
(1 914 World BuildingTulsa, Oklahoma 74103
C. Harrison Cooper
Paul W. Kayser
H. Neil S. MacKenzie
P. W. J. Wood
Edson Beckwith
Gail L. Ireland, Esquire
, .} 1300. benver Club Building
&” Denver, Colorado 80202
hn\y. McQambley, Esquire
: 2 Jaskson, Nash, Brsphy, arringer & Brooks
C 300 Wad? EN New Yoxk, w Yoxk 017
ohy J.\Beugee\(Pr{ S&) Carta?itd 50%, lst Nat'l Bank of
gdewodd BUilding Nw fet
Enghewobd, Colora 0100
John K. Beumee JolySamu . gerson; E Lré
: 90 d)dand” S n : Sing S204
® epfrer, Colorado 80202P. _6
Plaintiff Defendant
STATE OF OHID ‘E-2) Robert E. Brooker
Harry L. Hobson, Esq. Benjamin F. Stapleton, Esquire
Holland & Hart “Kenneth L. Starr, Esquire C
P.O. Box 8749 _~f Ireland, Stapleton, Pryor & Holmes1700 Broadway, Suite 2017
Denver, Colorado 80201 Denver, Colorado 80202
omas R. Mulroy, quire
Edwar Roth® Esglre
illham ENBarrowg, Esduir
- HORkin Suter, Owen, MWroy Davis
: { One Wirst\National Ba Pl ’ d Flooricado, Illinois 60670
A. Rowland Boucher (Prg Se) C
Denveg,—eolorado—30202
William V. Coffey
Feder and Morris
Harold ‘A. Feder, Esquire
1200 Western Federal Savings Building
Denver, Colorado
RQgexr "In, Davis (B#0 Se)”
Kenvery/ Colérado 80202
Frank A, Dixon
J. M. Slater, III, Esquire
| 665 San Jacinto Building - Houston, Texas 77002
A. F. Frederickson (Pro Se)
1964 W. Gray
| Houston, Texas 77019
A. F. Frederickso C Arthur A. Marg Esquire :
: 23 Street AlAE pr
Ne , New 36..." fee ty bok
Bennett King
Paul B. Rodden, Esquire
600 Western Federal Savings Building
\- Denver, Colorado 80202
"John M. King A —
wis GQ, JIsaacsgny—Egquire
A 10g Broadwe F—RXife] 1518 o 7 Denver, Colorado 802Q2. . P. 7 ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION C DOCKET NO. 79 =-- King Resources Company Securities Litigation (Continued) ee, ————————————————— —————— Plaintiff Defendant Timothy G. Lowry (Pro Se) 19th Floor, 6 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60602 o Timothy G. Lowry Thomas E. McCarthy, Esquire 11217 Mile High Center vr Denver, Colorado 80202 Jack M. Whitmey, II, Esquire James E. O'Halloran, Jr., Esquire Bell, Boyd, Lloyd, Haddad & Burns 135 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 LJ rank J. Retri ro\ Se) Lorret’ .2805 th tod PN\ac Den¥er, lorado es\ D.\Tough (Pxo Se) unsgt Drivg) \ | AA Enghlewodd, Xolorado \80110 / Lloyd R. Wade (Pro Se) Suite 1400 Colorado State Bank Bidg. Denver, Colo. 80202 OVER
p. _¥
Plaintiff Defendant
E-1 Paul A. Duden, Esquire
| Tooze, Kerr & Petersen o: 801 Standard Plaza
Portland, Oregon 97204
E-2 William J. Brown, Esquire Crofters, Inc.
Attorney General of Ohio Dee Gee Co.
State House Annex Sidney D. Griffith
Columbus, Ohio Harry A. Groban
Gerald A. Donahue
E-3 Same as E-2 (William J. Brown, Esq.) John J. Chester, Esquire
Chester & Rose
16 E. Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43216 C
Regency Income Corp. =
Ea Ff Morri EQUAL Sg Ey pl Wrigh Harolor £, Arnofd is GT 2x
Suite 980, 37 YW. Bxpagd Street Fold
Columbus “Ohio 4321% I. 2: =
Robert B. Crew, Jr. oo
Lo Apt. 803, 90 Corona St. —
. Denver, Colorado
Eliott K. Wollcott
, | Rte 1, Box M-19
~ Del Mar, California
Dunn & Bradstreet
c/o William Workman
_ ¢/o C., T. Corp.
Union Commerce Building
Cleveland, Ohio
inamsial nN rp. (area -9886A WNlshi BoNleva { eZ
Beverly lls, aldNorni Doo ®
R\naly R.\Ho\ard (¢ AL Cave // ’ SX Ro u A / /, i! Joa yi Bevxly\HiINs,\ California
E-3 Paul R. Duden (Same as E-1)
E-4 Richard F. Stevens, Esq. =
Baker, Hostetler & Patterson
1956 Union Commerce Bldg,
Cleveland, Ohio 44115 o
Pe. CHECKLIST FOR CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS . Pp. JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION DOCKET NO. 79 _— In re King Resources Company Securities Litigation C COMMON PARTY CHECKLIST NAME OF PARTY ] NAMED AS PARTY IN FOLLOWING ACTIONS | er Blyth & Co., tne. fmm mm . Li A-4;A-6; A-10; C-1 y ST ALA e AIO; C1 ZT Fog FE Re ———————————————————a (XT; 7-6 Aa-l0; c1 E7 £g-7Rowland Boucher oo Imperial american ~~ [mT Resogzoas Fund, Inc. [mm: 1
Pp. Imperial Americ Management Co. " Royal Resources Corp. 1 Royal Resources Explora- tion, Inc. Miscellaneous Royal 1 @® Resources Exploration -— Partnerhsips I Miscellaneous Imperial- [— American Resources Fund [7] Partnerships 7 Colorado Corp. AE NJ EE Paul D. Bagwell — J. L. Burke ~ 7 ~~ a] Myer Feldman ~ ee Joseph J. Foss AN ee ®
Pp. _3 JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION DOCKET NO. 79 - In re King Resources Fund Securities Litigation C COMMON PARTY CHECKLIST NAME OF PARTY NAMED AS PARTY IN FOLLOWING ACTIONS Af ee] George C. Hardin, Jr. . le > a Stanley C. Hope 7 ee a ~~ y= rovery E. marray |ee] I. Arthur 3. C. Underhill—————————— a ) ] Marvin R. Barmett ~~ [————— ——————————— EE a : ee Paul W. Fairchild [————————— re OOOO] ; ee @ |e ey a I Walter u. Sehirra, Jr @ ———————————————————— Frank Bliot Sweetser [—————————————————————
: Pe | David E. Melendy | NY [A =] 3 ~ 0000000000000] Arthur Young & Co. Peterson, Towry, Rall, [——————————— ®Barber & Ross IE ~ 1 ic Ginsburg, Feldman & Brass [———————————A — EE — Regency Management Corp. | ————— "7 — "= = |A San Francisco. Investment Corp., Inc. ~~ Peter M. Brockman~ I James Joseph Dellamana [1] NJ _-_ Herman Arthar Schwartz [1] NJ FE — | Emmerson Burnett I A ht
p. 5 JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION : DOCKET NO. 79 -- In re King Resources Fund Securities Litigation C COMMON PARTY CHECKLIST NAME OF PARTY NAMED AS PARTY IN FOLLOWING ACTIONS | 0 James John Curtis fm / — 0 Clifford Hector Munro frm mm —— ® ~ —— 0 O00 | EE 2 = J. Donald Rauth se aN 7 0 0 0VBVBVBm0m0 CT oy ey William v. coffey [C7 PE 0 FE Ey = Byron V. Boone es - EE = David B. Silberman [Sm — fcr oo Ng Frank Borman ~~ ® —————————————————— : — C. Harrison Cooper [Tm | FE H. Neil S. MacKenzie [~~~ N FEE ® Roger L. Davis 7 | 0071
Pp. __ o<--:r Lloyd R. Wade -_. ~N Edson E. Beckwish ] : ———— y= <-t gy q-5 Harding L. Lawrence EE — J I c-1, / £-5Oooo] James D. Toucher Louis E. Beckman a - c-: ££, = oo] Bennett King ee “~ 1 ci: ~~ £3ooo] John T. Fallon ee “J aaa cr ———————— @A. F. Frederickson ee “. eae Frank A. Dixon, Jr. 1] aa P. W. J. Wood I V ———————————————— ®
) Pp. 7 JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION DOCKET NO. 79 — IN RE KING RESOURCES FUND SECURITIES LITIGATION C COMMON PARTY CHECKLIST NAME OF PARTY NAMED AS PARTY IN FOLLOWING ACTIONS >= Frank J. Petrie o . TT _____________ ~~ . —_—_ Paul W. Kayser ee! ee ee <r John K. Beumee —_ NN i FF —__ — rc — J ; \Cre -Citp lide XL ee — ee ee — ee I ee ee — _ Fe —_———— ® ee ee YY] ee ee ee — C Ee
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.