IN RE: Electronic Aids Securities Litigation

Case MDL No. 66 Document 2 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 2
' EE |
BOCRET HO. 66 HR i; |
THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ie ye SRi : HRPFANE
"IN RE ELECTRONIC AIDS SECURITIES LITIGATION | |
| ORDER a nsAt the hearing held on February 26, 1971 in Washington, > 7 Eh
D. C., on the plaintiff's motion to transfer these actions to :
a single district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial pro- :
ceedings, counsel for the plaintiff advised the Panel that the
action pending in the Southern District.of New York had been 2 .
dismissed. Since there is but a single action remaining in ee |
this litigation at the present time, the motion has become moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that said motion be and the same | |
is hereby denied without prejudice to the right of any party to 2 |
-. seek transfer if other related actions are brought in different
federal district courts. Lo
FOR THE PANEL: : .
EE . - Chairman
Judges Weinfeld and Weigel did not participate in the decision
in this matter.

Case MDL No. 66 Document 2 Filed 04/30/15 Page 2 of 2
@ DOCKET NO. 66
SCHEDULE A
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND .
Rolf Topik, et al. v. Catalyst Research Civil Action
Corp., et al. No. 70-1228M
’ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Rolf Topik, et al. v. Mine Safety Appliances Civil Action
Company, et al. No. 70 Civ. 5207