USA v. Perjak

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NICHOLAS PERJAK,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 13-CR-30116-DWD
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DUGAN, District Judge:
This matter is currently before the Court on Defendant Nicholas Perjak’s Motion
for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Doc. 105). Perjak plead guilty to attempt
access with intent to view child pornography and access with intent to view child
pornography. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 60 months with 10 years
supervised release. Perjak was then released from imprisonment on October 13, 2020
and commenced his period of supervised release. On November 21, 2025, he filed the
instant motion alleging generally that he has completed over 5 years of supervised
release, that he has been compliant, maintained stable employment since 2022, and has
not violated any conditions apart from traffic violations.
The Probation Department confirms that Perjak has not violated any conditions
of 	supervised 	release, 	has 	completed 	appropriate 	sex 	offender 	treatment, 	has
maintained employment and has good family support. The United States Attorney’s
Case 3:13-cr-30116-DWD Document 108 Filed 03/24/26 Page 1 of 2 Page ID
#<pageID>

Office responded and does not object to Perjak’s motion for early termination of
supervised release. (Doc. 107)
18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) provides that “the court may, after considering the factors
set forth in section 3553(a) . . . terminate a term of supervised release and discharge the
defendant released at any time after the expiration of one year of supervised release,
pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure relating to the
modification of probation, if it is satisfied that such action is warranted by the conduct
of the defendant released and the interest of justice.” See also Fed. R. Crim. Proc.
32.1(c)(2) (allowing for modification of supervised release without a hearing).
After considering the motion and the Section 3553(a) factors, the Court finds that
early termination of Perjak’s supervised release is warranted by his conduct and in the
interest of justice. Accordingly, the Motion for Termination of Supervised Release (Doc.
105) 	is 	GRANTED. 	The 	previously 	imposed 	term 	of 	supervised 	release 	is
TERMINATED as of the date of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 24, 2026
DAVID W. DUGAN
United States District Judge
Case 3:13-cr-30116-DWD Document 108 Filed 03/24/26 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
#<pageID>