DOTSON v. DAVIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
TAURENCE TARELL DOTSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Sheriff DAVID DAVIS, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
5:25-cv-00115-TES-CHW
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s Order and
Recommendation [Doc. 17]. Plaintiff Taurence Tarell Dotson did not object to the
Recommendation in the allotted time. [Id. at p. 13]. So, after reviewing it for clear error,
the Court ADOPTS it and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 6(a)(1) and (d); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The magistrate judge recommended that the
Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for an injunction [Doc. 16] because the record is not
sufficiently developed to determine whether Plaintiff has met the high bar required to
obtain an injunction. [Doc. 17, p. 13]. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for an injunction
[Doc. 16] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this 1st day of December, 2025.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III
TILMAN E. SELF, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cv-00115-TES-AGH Document 20 Filed 12/01/25 Page 1 of 1