WINGFIELD v. ANDREWS et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
TIMOTHY BERNARD WINGFIELD,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSHUA ANDREWS,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
5:24-cv-00234-TES-CHW
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation [Doc. 23]. Neither party objected to the Recommendation in the
allotted time. [Id. at p. 7]. So, after reviewing it for clear error, the Court ADOPTS it and
MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1) and (d); 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1). The magistrate judge recommended that the Court deny Defendant’s
motion to dismiss because Defendant did not show that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his
administrative remedies or that Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim. [Doc. 23, p. 7].
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to dismiss [Doc. 18] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this 1st day of December, 2025.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III
TILMAN E. SELF, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:24-cv-00234-TES-CHW Document 24 Filed 12/01/25 Page 1 of 1