3:25-cv-00120•FAMBROUGH v. WARDEN COFFEE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION CRAIG JASON FAMBROUGH, Petitioner, v. Commissioner TYRONE OLIVER, Respondent.1 Case No. 3:25-cv-120-TES-AGH ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On October 29, 2025, the United States Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) and ultimately recommended that Respondent Tyrone Oliver’s motion to dismiss Petitioner’s application for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be granted and that, furthermore, a certificate of appealability should be denied. [Doc. 13]. Plaintiff has not timely filed an objection or sought an extension of time to file an objection within the 14-day period outlined in the magistrate judge’s R&R. [Id., p. 6]. Thus, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), in connection with Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1) & (d). 1 Petitioner originally identified the warden of Coffee County Correctional Facility as the respondent. [Doc. 1]. However, because Coffee County Correctional Facility is a private prison under contract with the state of Georgia, Tyrone Oliver—the Georgia Department of Corrections Commissioner—moved to intervene as Respondent. [Doc. 6]. The Court granted that motion on August 11, 2025. [Doc. 12]. Case 3:25-cv-00120-TES-AGH Document 14 Filed 12/01/25 Page 1 of 2
2 Having considered the R&R, the Court finds no clear enumeration of error and agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the United States Magistrate Judge’s R&R [Doc. 13] and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 9] and DISMISSES Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc. 1] as untimely. The Court further DENIES a certificate of appealability. SO ORDERED, this 1st day of December, 2025. S/ Tilman E. Self, III TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case 3:25-cv-00120-TES-AGH Document 14 Filed 12/01/25 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.