0:25-cv-61564•Frank v. Gingrande et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 0:25-cv-61564-WPD ALICIA FRANK ex rel MURIEL FRANK, Petitioner, v. BARBARA GINGRANDE and VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Respondents. / ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; ORDER OF DISMISSAL THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hunt (the “Report”) [DE 5], issued on November 14, 2025. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 5] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 5] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 5] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 5] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. The Petition is DENIED AS MOOT and the case is DISMISSED; Case 0:25-cv-61564-WPD Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/24/2025 Page 1 of 2
3. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 24th day of November, 2025. Copies furnished to: Magistrate Judge Hunt Counsel of record Case 0:25-cv-61564-WPD Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/24/2025 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.