5:24-cv-00274•TAYLOR v. RHODES
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION CARL TAYLOR, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 5:24cv274-MW/MJF TERRY L. RHODES, Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 25, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections, ECF No. 26. Plaintiff’s objections state in conclusory fashion that he followed Rule 4(e) and mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Defendant. However, as the Magistrate Judge notes, Plaintiff has not demonstrated how this constitutes effective service, nor has he met his burden to demonstrate that this satisfies the rules. Finally, Plaintiff’s objections note that “if no objection I ask for a[n] appeal.” ECF No. 26 at 1. Inasmuch as this Court construes Plaintiff’s filing, ECF No. 26, as objections to the report and recommendation, they are not also treated as an appeal Case 5:24-cv-00274-MW-MJF Document 27 Filed 02/25/26 Page 1 of 2
2 as no appealable order has yet been entered. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation, ECF No. 25, is accepted and adopted, over the Plaintiff’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED without prejudice.” The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on February 25, 2026. s/Mark E. Walker ____ United States District Judge Case 5:24-cv-00274-MW-MJF Document 27 Filed 02/25/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.