HASPEL v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA et al

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
MICHAEL HASPEL,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No. 5:23-cv-83-MCR-MJF
CENTURION OF FLORIDA, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation dated October 7,
2025, ECF No. 105. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and were afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to
Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has conducted a de novo
review of all timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto
timely filed, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be
adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. 	The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 105, is
adopted and incorporated by reference into this Order.
Case 5:23-cv-00083-MCR-MJF Document 124 Filed 01/13/26 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
2. 	Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 95, is GRANTED IN PART
and DENIED IN PART as follows:
a. 	Defendants’ motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s
claims against Centurion, Nurse Machuca and Nurse Fisher.
b. 	Defendants’ motion is 	DENIED 	with respect to Plaintiff’s
claims against Nurse Hesser, Nurse Haney and Physician Assistant Jansen.
c. 	Defendants’ motion is DENIED without prejudice on the issue
of punitive damages.
3. 	The following claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:
a. 	Plaintiff’s claims against Centurion, Nurse Machuca and Nurse
Fisher.
4. 	This case is RETURNED to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial
proceedings on Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Hesser, Haney and Jansen.
DONE and ORDERED this 13 th day of January 2026.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:23-cv-00083-MCR-MJF Document 124 Filed 01/13/26 Page 2 of 2