WOLFE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

4:25-cv-00426Flnd29.12.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
MATTHEW WOLFE,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 4:25-cv-426-TKW-MAF
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 15). No objections were filed.
Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire
case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case
should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g) because Plaintiff is a “three-striker,”
the complaint does not allege a plausible claim of “imminent danger,” and Plaintiff
did not pay the filing fee. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED.
3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g).
Case 4:25-cv-00426-TKW-MAF Document 17 Filed 12/29/25 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
5. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close
the case file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of December, 2025.
__________________________________
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:25-cv-00426-TKW-MAF Document 17 Filed 12/29/25 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.