CHARLEY v. FLORIDA DEPARMENT OF REVENUE et al

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
NASHUN DARNELL CHARLEY,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 3:25-cv-1823-TKW-ZCB
DAVID BEARDEN and
MARK RUBIN,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 8). No objections were filed.
Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire
case file, the Court agrees that Plaintiff’s second amended complaint should be
dismissed for the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge and that leave to amend
would be futile. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
Case 3:25-cv-01823-TKW-ZCB Document 9 Filed 12/08/25 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C.
§1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) because it fails to state a claim on which relief may be
granted and it seek monetary relief from immune defendants.
3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close
the case file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of December, 2025.
__________________________________
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-01823-TKW-ZCB Document 9 Filed 12/08/25 Page 2 of 2