3:25-cv-01323•LEVINE v. DIXON
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ARAY DONELL LEVINE, Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:25-cv-1323-TKW-MJF RICKY DIXON, Respondent. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) and Petitioner’s objections (Doc. 17). No response to the objections is needed. The Court reviewed the issues raised in the objections de novo under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), and based on that review, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination Petitioner’s amended §2254 habeas petition should be dismissed because it is time-barred. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED. Case 3:25-cv-01323-TKW-MJF Document 18 Filed 03/02/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 3. Petitioner’s amended §2254 habeas petition (Doc. 6) is DISMISSED with prejudice because it is time-barred. 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 5. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2026. __________________________________ T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:25-cv-01323-TKW-MJF Document 18 Filed 03/02/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.