RICHARDSON v. UNKNOWN OFFICER #1 et al

3:25-cv-01057Flnd09.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
EDWARD WARNELL RICHARDSON, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No. 3:25cv1057-MCR-HTC
UNKNOWN OFFICER #1, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation dated August 26,
2025. See ECF No. 11. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant
to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). 	I have made a de novo
determination of all timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. 	The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 11, is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Case 3:25-cv-01057-MCR-HTC Document 26 Filed 01/09/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
Case No. 3:25cv1057-MCR-HTC
2. 	This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under this Court’s
inherent power for Richardson’s failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history.
3. 	The Clerk is directed to close the case file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of January 2026.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-01057-MCR-HTC Document 26 Filed 01/09/26 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.