3:25-cv-01057•RICHARDSON v. UNKNOWN OFFICER #1 et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION EDWARD WARNELL RICHARDSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:25cv1057-MCR-HTC UNKNOWN OFFICER #1, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation dated August 26, 2025. See ECF No. 11. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 11, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Case 3:25-cv-01057-MCR-HTC Document 26 Filed 01/09/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 Case No. 3:25cv1057-MCR-HTC 2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under this Court’s inherent power for Richardson’s failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. 3. The Clerk is directed to close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of January 2026. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:25-cv-01057-MCR-HTC Document 26 Filed 01/09/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.