CLARK v. ROSENTHAL et al

Page 1 of 2
Case No. 1:26cv97-RH-HTC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
LUCY CLARK,
Plaintiff,
v. 	CASE NO. 1:26cv97-RH-HTC
MICHAEL ROSENTHAL et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation, ECF No. 5. No objections have been filed. More than 14 days
have run even since the most recent mailing of the report and recommendation. See
ECF No. 8. So even if the 14-day period for objections was deemed to run only
from that mailing, the deadline would have passed. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court’s
opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This case is dismissed without
Case 1:26-cv-00097-RH-HTC Document 10 Filed 06/25/26 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
Case No. 1:26cv97-RH-HTC
prejudice as malicious under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).” The clerk must close
the file.
SO ORDERED on June 25, 2026.
s/Robert L. Hinkle
United States District Judge
Case 1:26-cv-00097-RH-HTC Document 10 Filed 06/25/26 Page 2 of 2