1:25-cv-00088•SPENCER v. SHERIFF et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION RANDY SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-88-MCR-MJF SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation dated June 12, 2025. See ECF No. 5. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 5, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute, comply with Court orders, and pay the filing fee. Case 1:25-cv-00088-MCR-MJF Document 6 Filed 12/02/25 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 Case No. 1:25-cv-88-MCR-MJF 3. The Clerk is directed to close this case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of December 2025. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 1:25-cv-00088-MCR-MJF Document 6 Filed 12/02/25 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.