1:25-cv-00048•OLIVER v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
OLIVER v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
1:25-cv-00048Flnd03.12.2025
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION RICKY OLIVER, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 1:25-cv-48-MCR-ZCB SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. _____________________/ ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May 6, 2025. ECF No. 16. The Court furnished the Plaintiff a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Dismissal without prejudice for a plaintiff’s failure to accurately disclose his litigation history is an “appropriate exercise of a district court’s inherent authority to manage its docket and enforce the local rules.” McNair v. Johnson, 143 F.4th 1301, 1308 (11th Cir. 2025). Further, in dismissing a case without prejudice based Case 1:25-cv-00048-MCR-ZCB Document 31 Filed 12/03/25 Page 1 of 2
2 on a plaintiff’s misstatement of his litigation history, a court has the inherent ability to do so even in absence of a finding that the plaintiff’s misstatement was malicious. See Wromas v. Barker, Case No. 3:25cv891-MW/ZCB, 2025 WL 1953112 (N.D. Fla. July 16, 2025). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice as a malicious abuse of the judicial process under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), 1915A(b)(1). 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case. DONE AND ORDERED this 3 rd day of December 2025. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 1:25-cv-00048-MCR-ZCB Document 31 Filed 12/03/25 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.