1:24-vv-01698•LONCARICH-BOECKMAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
LONCARICH-BOECKMAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
1:24-vv-01698Uscfc20.01.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1698V ASHLEY LONCARICH-BOECKMAN, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran Filed: December 16, 2025 Timothy Patrick Clancy, Clancy & Thompson, PLLC, Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner. Rachelle Bishop, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON DAMAGES1 On October 18, 2024, Ashley Loncarich-Boeckman filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that the misadministration of an October 19, 2022 influenza vaccine caused her to suffer adverse effects that entitle her to compensation under the Act. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On December 15, 2025, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer, in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 1, 4-5. On December 16, 2025, I issued a Ruling on Entitlement. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:24-vv-01698-UNJ Document 27 Filed 01/20/26 Page 1 of 2
2 Respondent represents that Petitioner agrees to his proffer on an award of compensation. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 5. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer,3 Petitioner is awarded a lump sum of $52,500.00 (for pain and suffering) to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Proffer at 6-7. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Because the combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer contains information regarding Petitioner’s personal medical history, which is not generally included in a Proffer when separately filed, it is not attached hereto. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. Case 1:24-vv-01698-UNJ Document 27 Filed 01/20/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.