Delbridge v. Polis et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 25-cv-03973-PAB-CYC
JEFFREY DELBRIDGE,
Plaintiff,
v.
JARED POLIS,
MOSES ANDRE STANCIL,
ALLISON TALLEY, and
AMANDA RETTING,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
______________________________________________________________________________
Cyrus Y. Chung, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss his Third Claim for
Damages Against Defendants in their Official Capacities. ECF No. 3. As the motion to dismiss is
submitted by the plaintiff, the Court does not wait for a response from the defendants. See
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d). Accordingly, the Court respectfully RECOMMENDS1 that the
1 Be advised that all parties shall have fourteen days after service hereof to serve and file any
written objections in order to obtain reconsideration by the District Judge to whom this case is
assigned. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. The party filing objections must specifically identify those findings
or recommendations to which the objections are being made. The District Court need not
consider frivolous, conclusive, or general objections. A party’s failure to file such written
objections to proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report may bar the party
from a de novo determination by the District Judge of the proposed findings and
recommendations. United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676-83 (1980); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Additionally, the failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations
within fourteen days after being served with a copy may bar the aggrieved party from appealing
the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge that are accepted or adopted by
the District Court. Duffield v. Jackson, 545 F.3d 1234, 1237 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Moore v.
United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991)). Finally, all parties must consult and comply
Case No. 1:25-cv-03973-RMR-NRN Document 17 filed 01/06/26 USDC Colorado
pg 1 of 2

2
Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff’s Third Claim against the defendants in their Official Capacities,
ECF No. 3, be GRANTED.
Respectfully submitted this 6th day of January, 2026, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Cyrus Y. Chung
United States Magistrate Judge
with the District Judge’s practice standards for any specific requirements concerning the filing
and briefing of objections.
Case No. 1:25-cv-03973-RMR-NRN Document 17 filed 01/06/26 USDC Colorado
pg 2 of 2