1:23-cv-00447•Conkin v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE CHARLOTTE N. SWEENEY Civil Action: 23-cv-00447-CNS-NRN Date: January 21, 2025 Courtroom Deputy: Julie Dynes Court Reporter: Sarah Mitchell Parties Counsel GEORGE CONKIN David Roth Plaintiff v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY Heather Salg Defendant COURTROOM MINUTES ORAL ARGUMENT Court in Session: 8:29 a.m. Appearance of counsel. Argument as to [46] Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment given by Ms. Salg and Mr. Roth with questions from the Court. ORDERED: [46] Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge Prose is authorized. As outlined on the record, it is ORDERED: [45] Defendant’s Fed. R. Evid. 702 Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Plaintiff Industry Standard Expert Berns is GRANTED. [47] Plaintiff’s Motion to Limit the Testimony of Defendant’s Retained Expert Joel Varnell is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Court in Recess: 9:02 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:33 Case No. 1:23-cv-00447-CNS-SBP Document 62 filed 01/21/25 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.