Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc et al

1:06-cv-00605Cod30.07.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-BNB
CROCS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ACME EX-IM, INC.,
AUSTRALIA UNLIMITED, INC.,
D. MEYERS & SONS, INC.,
DOUBLE DIAMOND DISTRIBUTION, LTD.,
EFFERVESCENT, INC.,
HOLEY SOLES HOLDINGS, LTD.,
INTER-PACIFIC TRADING CORPORATION,
SHAKA HOLDINGS, INC., and
DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Leave to Reply to Response and
Objection by Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd. [docket no. 98, filed July 26, 2012] (the
“Motion”).
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and plaintiff may reply on or before
July 31, 2012. The reply shall be no longer than five (5) pages in length for the text not
counting the signature block.
DATED: July 30, 2012
Case No. 1:06-cv-00605-PAB-MDB Document 100 filed 07/30/12 USDC Colorado
pg 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.