Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L. v. United States et al

ERRATA
Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L. v. United States, Court No. 24-00264, Slip Op. 25-125, dated
September 23, 2025:
Page 12, line 13: change “aforementioned allegation assessment” to “on-site
verification report” in the sentence “The aforementioned allegation assessment is
insufficient as well.”
Page 12, line 14: change “assessment” to “report” in the sentence “The
assessment describes labor conditions at plaintiff’s facility during the EAPA on-
site verification.”
Page 12, lines 15-16: change “allegation assessment” to “on-site verification
report” in the sentence “However, because the allegation assessment predates
the forced labor investigation itself . . . .”
Page 12, line 18: change “allegation assessment to “on-site verification report” in
the clause “the court is unable to ‘reasonably discern[]’ the connection between
the factual allegations in the allegation assessment and the determination in the
Finding.”
December 12, 2025
Case 1:24-cv-00264-TMR Document 78 Filed 12/12/25 Page 1 of 1