Yue v. LaRose

3:26-cv-01391Casd09.03.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
26-cv-1391-JO-DDL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BENXING YUE,
Petitioner,
v.
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, et al.,
Respondents.
Case No.: 26-cv-1391-JO-DDL
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
In the interest of “efficient administration of the judicial business of the district,”
see Civ. L.R. 40.1(a), and because the Court concludes that this case is related to Yue v.
Noem, et al., 26-cv-1328-JES-SBC (S.D. Cal. 2025), the Court directs the Clerk to
immediately reassign this case to Judge James E. Simmons, Jr. See Badea v. Cox, 931
F.2d 573, 575 (9th Cir. 1991) (“District court judges have broad discretion regarding
the assignment or reassignment of cases.”) (cleaned up); In re Marshall, 721 F.3d 1032,
1040 (9th Cir. 2013) (“[J]udges are vested with inherent authority to transfer cases
among themselves for the expeditious administration of justice.”) (cleaned up).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 6, 2026 	_____________________________
Hon. Jinsook Ohta
United States District Judge
Dated: March 9, 2026 _____________________________
Hon. James E. Simmons, Jr.
United States District Judge
Case 3:26-cv-01391-JES-DDL Document 2 Filed 03/09/26 PageID.<pageID> Page
1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.