3:26-cv-01391•Yue v. LaRose
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 26-cv-1391-JO-DDL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BENXING YUE, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, et al., Respondents. Case No.: 26-cv-1391-JO-DDL ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE In the interest of “efficient administration of the judicial business of the district,” see Civ. L.R. 40.1(a), and because the Court concludes that this case is related to Yue v. Noem, et al., 26-cv-1328-JES-SBC (S.D. Cal. 2025), the Court directs the Clerk to immediately reassign this case to Judge James E. Simmons, Jr. See Badea v. Cox, 931 F.2d 573, 575 (9th Cir. 1991) (“District court judges have broad discretion regarding the assignment or reassignment of cases.”) (cleaned up); In re Marshall, 721 F.3d 1032, 1040 (9th Cir. 2013) (“[J]udges are vested with inherent authority to transfer cases among themselves for the expeditious administration of justice.”) (cleaned up). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 6, 2026 _____________________________ Hon. Jinsook Ohta United States District Judge Dated: March 9, 2026 _____________________________ Hon. James E. Simmons, Jr. United States District Judge Case 3:26-cv-01391-JES-DDL Document 2 Filed 03/09/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.