3:26-cv-00009•Devilmar v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ICE et al
Devilmar v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ICE et al
3:26-cv-00009Casd16.01.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 3:26-cv-0009-JES-MSB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FEDLIN DEVILMAR, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT ICE; AND OTAY MESA DETENTION CENTER Respondents. Case No.: 3:26-cv-0009-JES-MSB ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] Before the Court is Petitioner Fedlin Devilmar’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. Pursuant to the Court’s Order to Show Cause, Respondents filed a Response to the Petition. ECF No. 4. Case 3:26-cv-00009-JES-MSB Document 5 Filed 01/16/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
2 3:26-cv-0009-JES-MSB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DISCUSSION A. Jurisdiction In the Response to the Petition, Respondents argue that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this Petition because Petitioner failed to name the warden of Otay Mesa Detention Center as a Respondent. ECF No. 4 at 2. This issue has recently addressed by the undersigned in Guatam v. Corr. Corp of Am., No. 3:25-CV-3600-JES-DEB, 2026 WL 25846, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). Therefore, the Court elects to follow its reasoning in Guatam and incorporates it by reference. 2026 WL 25846, at *2. In light of Petitioner’s pro se status and the liberty interests at issue, the Court finds it prudent to follow suit of its sister courts and address the Petition on the merits rather than dismiss the Petition. B. Petitioner is a Maldonado Bautista Class Member Respondents acknowledged that Petitioner must be considered detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), pursuant to the final judgment entered in Maldonado Bautista v. Santacruz, No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, 2025 WL 3289861 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2025). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Petition as follows: (1) The Court ORDERS Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond determination hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within ten days of this Order. At the hearing, Respondents may not deny Petitioner bond on the basis that he is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2); and (2) Respondents are ORDERED to File a Notice of Compliance within five days of providing Petitioner with a bond redetermination hearing, including apprising the Court of the results of the hearing; and (3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE the suit after receipt of Respondents’ Notice. // // // Case 3:26-cv-00009-JES-MSB Document 5 Filed 01/16/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
3 3:26-cv-0009-JES-MSB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 16, 2026 Case 3:26-cv-00009-JES-MSB Document 5 Filed 01/16/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.