3:25-cv-01262•Warsaw v. Captain J. Garcia et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 25-cv-1262-JO-DDL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRISTOPHER D. WARSAW, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN J. GARCIA, CDCR A.W - A MAY AND STAFF A. PEREZ, Defendants. Case No.: 25-cv-1262-JO-DDL ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [Dkt. No. 17] On February 13, 2025, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Dkt. No. 1-3. Defendants removed the action to this Court on May 16, 2025. Dkt. No. 1. On May 29, 2025, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Dkt No. 2. On December 29, 2025, the Court issued a Report and Recommendation For Order Granting Defendants' Motion To Dismiss With Leave To Amend. Dkt. No. 15. The Court ordered the parties to file any written objections to the Report and Recommendation by January 12, 2026 and any replies to the objections by January 26, 2026. Id. at 11. On January 6, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time that was Case 3:25-cv-01262-JO-DDL Document 18 Filed 01/15/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2 25-cv-1262-JO-DDL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 entered onto the docket on January 14, 2026. Dkt. No. 17. Plaintiff seeks a sixty- day extension of time to file his objections to the Court’s Report and Recommendation. Id. at 1. In support, Plaintiff states that he needs additional time to “ascertain all facts [] to satisfy the Court ruling.”1 Id. Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED IN PART as follows: any written objections to the Report and Recommendation [see Dkt. No. 15] must be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than February 17, 2026.2 The document should be captioned “Objections to Report and Recommendation.” Any reply to the objections shall be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than March 2, 2026. The parties are advised that the failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to raise those objections on appeal of the Court’s order. See Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 15, 2026 Hon. David D. Leshner United States Magistrate Judge 1 Attached to Plaintiff’s motion are several documents related to inmate Michael Henderson. Dkt. No. 17 at 2-11. The Court is unsure of the purpose of these documents and has not considered them in its ruling. 2 The instant motion is entitled “”Motion” Extension of Time. Leave to Amend Pursuant to Court Order December 29, 2025.” Dkt. No. 17. For clarity, the February 16, 2026 deadline is not a deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. That deadline has not been set and will bet set by Judge Ohta should she choose to issue an Order Adopting the December 29, 2025 Report and Recommendation. Case 3:25-cv-01262-JO-DDL Document 18 Filed 01/15/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.