3:25-cv-00619•Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Coffman Specialties, Inc. et al
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Coffman Specialties, Inc. et al
3:25-cv-00619Casd09.10.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
- 1 - 25cv619 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. COFFMAN SPECIALTIES, INC. et al., Defendants. Case No. 25-cv-0619-BAS-JLB ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS COUNTS 2, 4, AND 5 (ECF No. 69) Presently before the Court is Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Counts 2, 4, and 5 of Plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s Complaint. (ECF No. 69.) The Court GRANTS Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Dismiss. (Id.) Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary judgment or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective upon the filing of a notice or stipulation, as described in Rule 41(a)(1)(A), and no court order is required. Stone v. Woodford, No. CIV-F-05-845 AWI-DLB, 2007 WL 527766 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2007). A dismissal is without prejudice unless the parties stipulate otherwise. Fed. R. Civ. P. Case 3:25-cv-00619-BAS-JLB Document 70 Filed 10/09/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 25cv619 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 41(a)(1)(B). However, the local civil rules of this district require that where, as here, litigants seek voluntary dismissal pursuant to stipulation, in accordance with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the stipulation of dismissal must be filed as a joint motion. See CivLR 7.2. Having considered Parties’ joint submission, the Court GRANTS Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Dismiss. (ECF No. 69.) Thus, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Counts 2, 4, and 5 from the Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 9, 2026 Hon. Cynthia Bashant, Chief Judge United States District Court Case 3:25-cv-00619-BAS-JLB Document 70 Filed 10/09/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.