Gonzalez v. Jeld-Wen, Inc. et al

Order Dismissing Entire Action Without Prejudice Pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GABRIEL GONZALEZ, on behalf of
others similarly situated
Plaintiff,
vs.
JELD-WEN, INC. and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:24-cv-01116-JO-DTF
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] Order Dismissing Entire
Action Without Prejudice Pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Removal Date: 	June 27, 2024
Complaint Filed: May 23, 2024
Case 3:24-cv-01116-JO-DTF Document 52 Filed 01/21/26 PageID.<pageID> Page
1 of 2

- 1 - 	Case No. 3:24-cv-01116-JO-DTF
Order Dismissing Entire Action Without Prejudice Pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On January 20, 2026, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action without
prejudice. All parties have agreed to the dismissal.
In light of the stipulation, the case has been dismissed without prejudice pursuant
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. 	See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); see also
Ripley v. Bridgestone Retail Ops., LLC., No. C09-1482 RSM, 2010 WL 11684294, at
*2 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 2, 2010) (citing Moore’s Federal Practice 3d, § 23.64[2][a]
(2007)); see also Richey v. GetWellNetwork, Inc., No. 20-cv-2205-BEN-BLM, 2021
WL 424281, at *3 (“Because no class has been certified in this case, Rule 23 does not
mandate either court approval of the instant settlement or notice to putative class
members” [quoting Allred v. Chicago Title Co., No. 19CV2129-LAB (AHG), 2020
WL 5847550, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2020]).
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
HON. JINSOOK OHTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1/21/2026
Case 3:24-cv-01116-JO-DTF Document 52 Filed 01/21/26 PageID.<pageID> Page
2 of 2