4:25-cv-10609•Pierce v. Air Systems, Inc.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. AIR SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. Case No. 4:25-cv-10609-KAW ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND; ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 18 On January 6, 2026, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand. (Pl.’s Mot., Dkt No. 18.) On January 16, 2026, Defendant argued that Plaintiff conceded in other briefing that the CBA met the standards for the application of Labor Code § 514 exemption. (Def.’s Opp’n, Dkt. No. 21 at 9.) As a result, Defendant argues that federal jurisdiction is conferred by § 301 of the LMRA pursuant to Curtis v. Irwin Industries, Inc., 913 F.3d 1146, 1154 (9th Cir. 2019). Id. The Court agrees. Indeed, “post-Curtis, a majority of courts in this circuit have found that an affirmative defense of § 301 is sufficient to raise a federal question that can be removed even absent mention of a CBA or a concession from the plaintiff that the CBA applied to them.” Lainez v. Wilhelm, LLC, No. 4:23-CV-04421-KAW, 2024 WL 4291857, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2024) (citing Jimenez v. Young's Mkt. Co., LLC, No. 21-CV-02410-EMC, 2021 WL 5999082, at *7 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021) (collecting cases)). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Dkt. No. 18) is DENIED without prejudice. The Court sets the hearing for the pending motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 11) for April 16, 2026 at 1:30 p.m., U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. // Case 4:25-cv-10609-KAW Document 30 Filed 02/23/26 Page 1 of 2
2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California Finally, Defendant is ordered to lodge a chambers copy of the notice of removal, with all exhibits tabbed, within 7 days of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 23, 2026 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge Case 4:25-cv-10609-KAW Document 30 Filed 02/23/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.