Singh et al v. Bondi et al

4:25-cv-08462Cand20.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
H ARPREET S INGH, ET AL .,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
PAM B ONDI , ET AL .,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:25-cv-08462-YGR
O RDER DISMISSING CASE
On December 17, 2025, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why the petition
should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiffs were ordered to respond
by no later than December 22, 2025, and were warned that failure to respond would result in the
dismissal of this action. Plaintiff did not file a response.
Pursuant to the Court’s December 17, 2025 order, this case is DISMISSED. The clerk shall
close the action.
I T I S S O O RDERED.
Dated: February 20, 2026
YVONNE G ONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Case 4:25-cv-08462-YGR Document 12 Filed 02/20/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.