4:25-cv-08462•Singh et al v. Bondi et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA H ARPREET S INGH, ET AL ., Plaintiffs, vs. PAM B ONDI , ET AL ., Defendants. Case No. 4:25-cv-08462-YGR O RDER T O S HOW CAUSE Re: Dkt Nos. 1, 7 The Court has received the petition for the writ of habeas corpus from Harpreet Singh, Gurpatap Bhatti, Arman Singh Dhillon, Rohit Rohit, Princepal Singh, and Jaskanpreet Singh. Dkt. Nos. 1, 7. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243, respondents are ordered to show cause why the writ should not be granted. Respondents must return the order to show cause within three days of the filing of this order. In order to protect this Court’s jurisdiction, and pending further order of the Court, defendants are barred from removing petitioners from the United States. The Court further S ETS a status conference for Wednesday December 3, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. via Zoom. The Clerk of Court shall serve this Order to Show Cause by email to the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California. I T I S S O O RDERED. Dated: December 1, 2025 YVONNE G ONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-08462-YGR Document 8 Filed 12/01/25 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.