IntusCare, Inc. v. RTZ Associates, Inc.

4:24-cv-01132Cand13.05.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
INTUS CARE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
RTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 24-cv-01132-JST (AGT)
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 130
1. Non-party High Desert PACE, Inc., recently voluntarily shared certain emails with
Intus Care, Inc., related to the subject matter of this case. RTZ Associates, Inc., seeks to
preclude Intus from using these emails because High Desert PACE shared them with Intus
after the March 9, 2026, fact-discovery cutoff. See Dkt. 130 at 1–3; Dkt. 91 at 1.
The fact-discovery cutoff isn’t implicated in this scenario. “A discovery cutoff date
does not . . . affect admissibility of evidence obtained outside of the discovery process of the
case . . . .” Whittaker Corp. v. Execuair Corp., 736 F.2d 1341, 1347 (9th Cir. 1984). Here,
because High Desert PACE voluntarily shared the emails in question, the Court concludes
that Intus obtained the emails “outside of the discovery process of the case.” Id.
Case 4:24-cv-01132-JST Document 141 Filed 05/13/26 Page 1 of 2
2
The fact-discovery cutoff doesn’t preclude Intus from using the emails, but this hold-
ing is without prejudice to other arguments RTZ might raise at trial for excluding them.
2. Intus may not depose Kevin Lathrop, the President of Collabrios Health, LLC, at
this time. Lathrop is a fact witness; and as noted above, the fact-discovery cutoff has passed.
Intus suggests that because RTZ’s damages expert identified Lathrop as the source of certain
“revenue figures cited in his report,” dkt. 130 at 4, Intus may depose Lathrop during expert
discovery. Intus hasn’t cited any legal authority for this contention, and without such author-
ity, the Court won’t allow Lathrop’s modest contribution to the expert’s source data to open
the door to what would effectively be an untimely fact-witness deposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 13, 2026
______________________________
Alex G. Tse
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 4:24-cv-01132-JST Document 141 Filed 05/13/26 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.