Rodriguez v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority

4:23-cv-01379Cand19.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
JT. STIP. RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
Manny Starr (319778)
Manny@frontierlawcenter.com
Frontier Law Center
23901 Calabasas Road, #2074
Calabasas, CA 91302
Telephone: (818) 914-3433
Facsimile: (818) 914-3433
CHURCH STATE COUNCIL
Alan J. Reinach, Esq. SBN. 196899
Jonathon S. Cherne, SBN. 281548
2686 Townsgate Road,
Westlake Village, CA 91359
Tel. 805.413-7398
Fax: 805.497-3828
E-mail: ajreinach@churchstate.org
Jcherne@churchstate.org
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARINO JAIR RODRIGUEZ, et al
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARINO JAIR RODRIGUEZ, an individual;
JENNIFER NORRIS MENA, an individual;
WILLIAM KENNEDY, an individual; ANNE
MARIE RUIZ, an individual; ROBERT
RICHARD BIRCHER, an individual;
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL SACIL, an
individual; ELIZABETH ALVAREZ
SANCHEZ, an individual; JAMES
MATTHEW BUCKLEY, an individual;
JOHN DAVID ROLLAND, an individual;
MARTA MAHEALANI SACIL, an
individual; MICHAEL EDWARD
POYTHRESS, an individual; and TERRENCE
DARBY, an individual
Plaintiff(s),
v.
SANTA CLARA VALLEY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; and
SHAW HR CONSULTING, INC.; and DOES
1 to 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 23-cv-01379-HSG
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS FOR THE
CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; ORDER
[Complaint Filed: November 14, 2022]
Trial Date:
The remaining Plaintiffs in this action, Marino Jair Rodriguez, Jennifer Norris Mena,
William Kennedy, Robert Richard Bircher, Michael Edward Poythress, John David Rolland, and
Case 4:23-cv-01379-HSG Document 142 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
JT. STIP. RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
Elizabeth Alvarez Sanchez and Defendant Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
(collectively the “Parties”) hereby stipulate and request as follows:
1. The Parties have met and conferred as required by the Court’s Order following the
further Case Management Conference held on February 17, 2026 (Dkt. 140).
2. The Parties’ stipulate that the Opening Supplemental Briefs in support of their
respective summary judgment motions shall be filed by 5:00 PM on February 24, 2026. The
Opening Briefs shall be no more than ten pages in length.
3. The Parties’ stipulate that the Oppositions to the respective supplemental summary
judgment briefs shall be filed on or before February 27, 2026. The Opposition Briefs shall be no
more than ten pages in length.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: February 19, 2026
FRONTIER LAW CENTER
CHURCH STATE COUNCIL
By:
ALAN J REINACH
JONATHON CHERNE
MANNY M. STARR
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MARINO JAIR RODRIGUEZ, et al
Dated: February 19, 2026
ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO
By:
RUTH M. BOND
Attorneys for Defendant
SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
/s/ Jonathon Cherne
/s/ Ruth Bond
Case 4:23-cv-01379-HSG Document 142 Filed 02/19/26 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
JT. STIP. RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
ORDER ON PARTIES’ STIPULATION
The Court has reviewed the Parties’ Stipulation and the Court hereby adopts the briefing
schedule proposed by the parties:
The Parties’ Opening Supplemental Briefs in support of their respective summary
judgment motions shall be filed by 5:00 PM on February 24, 2026. The Opening Briefs shall be
no more than ten pages in length.
The Parties’ Oppositions to the respective supplemental summary judgment briefs shall be
filed on or before February 27, 2026. The Opposition Briefs shall be no more than ten pages in
length.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated:
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
2/19/2026
Case 4:23-cv-01379-HSG Document 142 Filed 02/19/26 Page 3 of 3

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.