WhatsApp Inc. et al v. NSO Group Technologies Limited et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
WHATSAPP LLC and
META PLATFORMS, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:19-cv-07123-PJH
FINAL JUDGMENT
Case 4:19-cv-07123-PJH Document 810 Filed 11/12/25 Page 1 of 2

1
F INAL J UDGMENT
CASE N O. 4:19- CV-07123-PJH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On December 20, 2024, the Court granted summary judgment as to liability in favor of
Plaintiffs WhatsApp LLC and Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) and against Defendants NSO
Group Technologies Limited and Q Cyber Technologies Limited (“Defendants”). Dkt. No. 494.
The case subsequently proceeded to trial on the issue of damages only.
On May 6, 2025, a jury entered a unanimous verdict in favor of Plaintiffs and against De-
fendants in the total amount of $167,698,719, consisting of $444,719 in compensatory damages and
$167,254,000 in punitive damages. Dkt No. 736. On October 17, 2025, the Court granted Plain-
tiffs’ motion for a permanent injunction and remitted the punitive damages award to $4,002,471.
Dkt. No. 802. Plaintiffs accepted the remittitur on October 31, 2025. On November 12, 2025, the
Court entered its permanent injunction.
Accordingly, the Court hereby enters final judgment in favor of Plaintiffs as to Defendants
in the amount of $4,447,190, consisting of $444,719 in compensatory damages and $4,002,471 in
punitive damages. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, post-judgment interest shall be calculated from
the date of the entry of the judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity
Treasury yield, as published by the Board of Governors for the Federal Reserve System, for the cal-
endar week preceding the date of the judgment. This final judgment shall also include the perma-
nent injunction.
This document constitutes a judgment and a separate document for purposes of Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 58(a). Without affecting the finality of the Court’s judgment in any way, the
Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of enforcing its judgment and considering
any motions for attorney’s fees or costs. The Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment forthwith.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: 	November 12, 2025 	By: 	/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton
Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Judge
Case 4:19-cv-07123-PJH Document 810 Filed 11/12/25 Page 2 of 2