Sanders v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District

3:23-cv-04416Cand03.03.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEPHEN (REX) SANDERS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BAY AREA AIR QUALITY
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,
Defendant.
Case No. 23-cv-04416-RFL
RULINGS REGARDING INDIVIDUAL
EXHIBITS FROM ILLUMYX
DEPOSITIONS
Attached as Exhibit A are the Court’s rulings regarding Defendant’s hearsay objections to
certain exhibits from the Illumyx depositions (Trial Exhibits 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41,
42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50), which were raised on March 2, 2026. The attached rulings
explain why the Air District’s hearsay objections have been overruled, and supplement the
explanation and limiting instructions provided on February 27 and March 2. The Court’s rulings
on the Air District’s other objections, including under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, were
separately addressed on the record on February 27 and March 2 and are not repeated in the
attached chart.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 3, 2026
RITA F. LIN
United States District Judge
Case 3:23-cv-04416-RFL Document 331 Filed 03/03/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.