3:23-cv-00770•Mobley v. Workday, Inc.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEREK MOBLEY, Plaintiff, v. WORKDAY, INC., Defendant. Case No. 23-cv-00770-RFL ORDER REGARDING WEBSITE DISPUTES Re: Dkt. Nos. 223, 224 Having reviewed the parties’ statements (Dkt. Nos. 223–224), the following Order is entered: 1. Plaintiffs may provide a fillable Consent to Join Form directly on the website as proposed. The website and accompanying long form notice provide sufficient context for the form. 2. Use of the “logo” and “shaded box with the text ‘Court Authorized Notice/Workday Applicants 40+/Visit workdaycase.com for the full notice and forms’” is authorized. These items are neither misleading nor prejudicial to Workday. 3. The capture of electronic signatures via checkbox, a practice that is routinely used in online agreements, is authorized. The requirement that individuals provide their date of birth and contact information prior to signing is a sufficient safeguard to avoid fraud and/or non-human submissions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 23, 2025 RITA F. LIN United States District Judge Case 3:23-cv-00770-RFL Document 225 Filed 12/23/25 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.