Andersen et al v. Stability AI Ltd. et al

DEFENDANTS STABILITY AI LTD. AND STABILITY
AI, INC.’S STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT LETTER BRIEF R
EGARDING TRAINING-DATA PRODUCTION
Case No. 3:23-cv-00201-WHO (LJC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Counsel Listed on Signature Pages]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SARAH ANDERSEN, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
STABILITY AI LTD., ET AL.,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:23-cv-00201-WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE
JOINT LETTER BRIEF REGARDING
STABILITY AI’S TRAINING-DATA
PRODUCTION
Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick
Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 439 Filed 03/09/26 Page 1 of 3

2
DEFENDANTS STABILITY AI LTD. AND STABILITY
AI, INC.’S STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT LETTER BRIEF R
EGARDING TRAINING-DATA PRODUCTION
Case No. 3:23-cv-00201-WHO (LJC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs Sarah Andersen, Karla Ortiz, Grzegorz Rutkowski, Gregory Manchess, Gerald
Brom, Jingna Zhang, Julia Kaye, and Adam Ellis (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Stability AI Ltd.
and Stability AI, Inc. (collectively, “Stability AI”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby
stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on November 25, 2025, Plaintiffs sent a letter to Stability AI requesting nine
categories of information related to Stability AI’s training data production, including the existence
of a manifest, the completeness of metadata and training-run mapping, and the identification of
preprocessing steps;
WHEREAS, during the January 22, 2026 Discovery Status Conference, the Court directed
the Parties to meet and confer to resolve the dispute;
WHEREAS, the Court previously extended the parties’ deadline for filing a Joint Letter
Brief from February 27, 2026 to March 11, 2026;
WHEREAS, the Parties have been meeting and conferring regarding the training data
production issues and wish to continue those discussions in good faith to attempt to resolve the
dispute without judicial intervention;
WHEREAS, to date, there have been minimal time modifications in the case by stipulation
or Court order;1
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between
the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, as follows:
1. The deadline for filing a Joint Letter Brief regarding the outstanding disputes over
Stability AI’s training-data production is extended from March 11, 2026 to March 18,
2026.
2. The Parties shall meet and confer in good faith regarding the training-data production
issues on or before March 14, 2026.
3. If the Parties resolve the dispute, they shall promptly notify the Court by filing a joint
stipulation.
1 See ECF Nos. 28, 29, 39, 40, 137, 138, 152, 153, 270, 273, 295, 296, 310-13, 315, 317, 399,
401, 409-11, 416, 417, 432.
Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 439 Filed 03/09/26 Page 2 of 3

3
DEFENDANTS STABILITY AI LTD. AND STABILITY
AI, INC.’S STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT LETTER BRIEF
REGARDING TRAINING-DATA PRODUCTION
Case No. 3:23-cv-00201-WHO (LJC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute by March 18, 2026, either Party may file
a Joint Letter Brief on or before that date in accordance with the Court’s procedures.
5. Nothing in this Stipulation shall be construed as a waiver of either Party’s rights or
positions regarding the scope, completeness, or sufficiency of Stability AI’s training
data production, or any other issue in this litigation.
6. This Stipulation shall be binding on all signatory parties and their successors, assigns,
and counsel.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 9, 2026
The Honorable Lisa J. Cisneros
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 439 Filed 03/09/26 Page 3 of 3