USA v. Arteaga et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
SIERRA PROMISE DUGAN
Sierra Dugan Law
420 3rd Street, Suite 250
Oakland, California 94607
Tel. 510.214.2194
Fax. 510.451.3002
sierra@sierraduganlaw.com
Counsel for Defendant
JOSE MEDINA MURILLO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSE MEDINA MURILLO,
Defendant.
No. 3:23-CR-00473 CRB
STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME
UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT FROM
DECEMBER 17, 2025 THROUGH
JANUARY 6, 2026; [PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties were scheduled to appear for status on December 17, 2025 that has been
continued to January 6, 2026 at the defense’s request for effective preparation of counsel. The
parties stipulate and respectfully request that the time from December 17, 2025 through January 6,
2026 be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel
the reasonable time to necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: December 16, 2025 s/ Sierra Dugan
SIERRA DUGAN
Counsel for Defendant
JOSE MEDINA MURILLO
Case 3:23-cr-00473-CRB Document 90 Filed 12/19/25 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
USA v. Medina Murillo, Stipulation and
[Proposed] Order, Case No. 3:23-cr-00473-CRB
2
Dated: December 16, 2025 s/ SD per email authorization
KEVIN YEH
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Case 3:23-cr-00473-CRB Document 90 Filed 12/19/25 Page 2 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
USA v. Medina Murillo, Stipulation and
[Proposed] Order, Case No. 3:23-cr-00473-CRB
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
For the reasons stated in the parties’ stipulations, the Court finds that the exclusion of time
for effective preparation from December 17, 2025 through January 6, 2025, is warranted and that
the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant
in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The failure to grant the requested continuance by the
defense would deny the defendant the time necessary for effective preparation of counsel taking
into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
December 19, 2025
Case 3:23-cr-00473-CRB Document 90 Filed 12/19/25 Page 3 of 3