Hughes et al v. Apple, Inc.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of
 California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAUREN HUGHES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 22-cv-07668-VC (TSH)
ORDER RE MOTION TO SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 179
The sealing motion at ECF No. 179 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is
granted as to Exhibits A, B, C, D and E. But it’s denied as to the joint discovery letter brief
because the redactions are overbroad. Much of the letter brief is just legal argument and does not
merit sealing. This denial is without prejudice to Plaintiffs proposing narrowly tailored redactions
within five days.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2025
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:22-cv-07668-VC Document 184 Filed 10/21/25 Page 1 of 1