Hughes et al v. Apple, Inc.

3:22-cv-07668Cand03.11.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United
 States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAUREN HUGHES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 22-cv-07668-VC (TSH)
ORDER RE MOTION TO SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 187
The motion to seal at ECF No. 187 is denied because the proposed redactions are
overbroad. This order is without prejudice to Plaintiffs proposing narrowly tailored redactions
within five days.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 3, 2025
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:22-cv-07668-VC Document 199 Filed 11/03/25 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.