Giuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.Musk

3:22-cv-05937Cand02.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ELON MUSK’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Alex Spiro (pro hac vice)
alexspiro@quinnemanuel.com
Ellyde R. Thompson (pro hac vice)
ellydethompson@quinnemanuel.com
Jesse A. Bernstein (pro hac vice)
Jessebernstein@quinnemanuel.com
295 Fifth Ave., New York, NY 10010
Telephone: 	(212) 849-7000
Facsimile: 	(212) 849-7100
Michael T. Lifrak (Bar No. 210846)
michaellifrak@quinnemanuel.com
Stephen A. Broome (Bar No. 314605)
stephenbroome@quinnemanuel.com
Alex Bergjans (Bar No. 302830)
alexbergjans@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: 	(213) 443-3000
Facsimile: 	(213) 443-3100
Attorneys for Defendant Elon Musk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GIUSEPPE PAMPENA, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ELON R. MUSK,
Defendant.
CASE NO. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT ELON MUSK’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF
OPPOSITIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Magistrate Judge: Hon. Donna M. Ryu
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 389 Filed 02/02/26 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1- 	Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ELON MUSK’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered Defendant Elon Musk’s Administrative Motion to Seal, the Court hereby
GRANTS (IN PART) / DENIES (IN PART) the Motion and ORDERS that the following materials
shall be sealed:
Material to Be Filed Under Seal Under 79-5(f)
Document 	Description 	Designating Party
Defendant’s Opposition to the
Motion in Limine No. 1 to
Preclude Evidence of Certain
Extraneous Legal Proceedings
Page 4:19-22 	Non Party Peiter Zatko
Exhibit A to the Bergjans
Decl. filed in Support of
Oppositions to Motions in
Limine
Excerpts from the transcript of
the deposition of Peiter Zatko,
taken on September 30, 2022
Non Party Peiter Zatko
Defendant’s Opposition to the
Motion in Limine No. 4 to
Preclude Opinion, Testimony,
Evidence, and Argument
Concerning Fake or Spam
Account Estimates
Page 2:16-19, 25 	Non Party Anthony
Armstrong
Exhibit I to the Bergjans
Decl. filed in Support of
Oppositions to Motions in
Limine
Excerpts from the transcript of
the deposition of Anthony
Armstrong, taken on
September 22, 2022
Non Party Anthony
Armstrong
Defendant’s Opposition to the
Motion in Limine No. 5 to
Admit Statements by Musk’s
Purported Agents
Page 5:14-16, 25 	Non Party Michael Grimes
Exhibit C to the Bergjans
Decl. filed in Support of
Oppositions to Motions in
Limine
Excerpts from the transcript of
the deposition of Michael
Grimes, taken on September
15, 2022
Non Party Michael Grimes
Defendant’s Opposition to the
Motion in Limine No. 2 to
Preclude Defenses based on
the Performance of Counsel
Page 2:22-24, 5:11-15 	Non-Parties listed below
Exhibit F to the Bergjans
Decl. filed in Support of
Oppositions to Motions in
Limine
Excerpts from the transcript of
the deposition of Marty
Korman, taken on September
22, 2022
Non Party Marty Korman
Exhibit G to the Bergjans
Decl. filed in Support of
Excerpts from the transcript of
the deposition of Parag
Non Party Parag Agrawal
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 389 Filed 02/02/26 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
09172-
00004A/17745819.1
-2- 	Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ELON MUSK’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Oppositions to Motions in
Limine
Agrawal, taken on October 3,
2022
Exhibit H to the Bergjans
Decl. filed in Support of
Oppositions to Motions in
Limine
Excerpts from the transcript of
the deposition of William
Savitt, taken on May 19, 2025
Non Party William Savitt
IT IS SO ORDERED
Date:
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
February 2, 2026
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 389 Filed 02/02/26 Page 3 of 3

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.