Giuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.Musk

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ OMNIBUS-ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED (OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE 1-3)
COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP
Joseph W. Cotchett (SBN 36324)
jcotchett@cpmlegal.com
Mark C. Molumphy (SBN 168009)
mmolumphy@cpmlegal.com
Tyson C. Redenbarger (SBN 294424)
tredenbarger@cpmlegal.com
Elle D. Lewis (SBN 238329)
elewis@cpmlegal.com
Gia Jung (SBN 340160)
gjung@cpmlegal.com
Caroline A. Yuen (SBN 354388)
cyuen@cpmlegal.com
San Francisco Airport Office Center
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
Burlingame, California 94010
Telephone: (650) 697-6000
BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC.
Francis A. Bottini, Jr. (SBN 175783)
fbottini@bottinilaw.com
Aaron P. Arnzen (SBN 218272)
aarnzen@bottinilaw.com
7817 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 102
La Jolla, California 92037
Telephone: (858) 914-2001
Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Class
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
GIUSEPPE PAMPENA, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ELON R. MUSK,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’
OMNIBUS-ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
SEALED (OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS
IN LIMINE 1-3)
Date:
Time: February 17, 2025
2:00 p.m.
Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor
Judge: 	Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 388 Filed 02/02/26 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:22-CV-05937-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ OMNIBUS-ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED (OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE 1-3)
1
AND NOW, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Administrative Motion to
Consider Whether Another Party’ Material Should be Sealed (Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to
Defendant’s Motions in Limine 1-3), filed January 29, 2026, all responses and replies thereto, all
authories cited therein, the evidence, arguments of counsel, and for other good cause known to the
Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs’ Omnibus-Administrative Motion To Consider Whether Another Party’s
Material Should Be Sealed (Oppositions to Motions In Limine 1-3) is GRANTED (IN
PART) / DENIED (IN PART).
2. The requested portions of 	shall be sealed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
HONORALBE CHARLES R. BREYER
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
February 2, 2026
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 388 Filed 02/02/26 Page 2 of 2