In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES
Case No. 3:22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
LAUREN R. GOLDMAN (pro hac vice)
lgoldman@gibsondunn.com
DARCY C. HARRIS (pro hac vice)
dharris@gibsondunn.com
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: (212) 351-4000
Facsimile: (212) 351-4035
ELIZABETH K. MCCLOSKEY (SBN 268184)
emccloskey@gibsondunn.com
ABIGAIL A. BARRERA (SBN 301746)
abarrera@gibsondunn.com
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94111-3715
Telephone: (415) 393-8200
Facsimile: (415) 393-8306
Additional Attorneys in Signature Block
Attorneys for Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.
1. GEOFFREY GRABER (SBN 211547)
2. ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
3. COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL
PLLC
4. 1100 New York Ave. NW, 8th Floor
5. Washington, DC 20005
6. Telephone: (202) 408-4600
7. Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
8. Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes (SBN 362776)
9. jaybarnes@simmonsfirm.com
SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC
112 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (212) 784-6400
Facsimile: (212) 213-5949
Additional Attorneys in Signature Block
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the
Proposed Class
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE
LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
All Actions
Case No. 3:22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING CLASS CERTIFICATION
DEADLINES
Hon. William H. Orrick
Case 3:22-cv-03580-WHO Document 1274 Filed 01/21/26 Page 1 of 3

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES
Case No. 3:22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs John Doe II, John Doe III, Jane Doe I, Jane Doe
IV, Jane Doe V, Jane Doe IX, and Jane Doe X (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Meta
Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on November 3, 2025, the Court granted the parties’ stipulated briefing deadlines
related to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 1210, the “Scheduling Order”);
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2025, Meta filed its Opposition and five expert reports;
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2025, Meta filed six Rule 702 Motions to Exclude certain
testimony from Plaintiffs’ experts;
WHEREAS, the parties have worked diligently to schedule the depositions of Meta’s experts
and other declarants, but due to scheduling constraints and witness availability, the dates will extend
through February;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Plaintiffs’ Rule 702 Motions related to Meta’s
Class Certification Opposition are due January 28, 2026, Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of their Class
Certification Motion (“Class Certification Reply”), any reply expert reports, and any oppositions to
Meta’s Rule 702 Motions are due February 11, 2026;
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and respectfully submit that, due to the
complexity and importance of the issues presented as well as the volume of expert testimony and
material, good cause exists to adjust the deadlines in the Scheduling Order. The Parties also seek to
reschedule the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and the parties’ Rule 702 Motions
and extend their ADR deadline to accommodate the adjustments to the briefing schedule.
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the
Parties, subject to this Court’s approval, that:
1. Plaintiffs shall file their Class Certification Reply and rebuttal expert reports; any
opposition(s) to Meta’s Rule 702 Motions; and any affirmative Rule 702 motions by March 11, 2026;
3. Meta shall file replies in support of its Rule 702 Motions by April 14, 2026;
4. Meta shall file responses to Plaintiffs’ Rule 702 Motions by April 28, 2026;
5. Plaintiffs shall file replies in support of their affirmative Rule 702 Motions by May 26, 2026;
Case 3:22-cv-03580-WHO Document 1274 Filed 01/21/26 Page 2 of 3

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
CLASS CERTIFICATION DEADLINES
Case No. 3:22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6. The parties shall participate in an ADR mediation session no later than May 26, 2026;
7. Subject the Court’s calendar and convenience, the parties request that the hearing on
Plaintiffs’ Class Certification Motion and the parties’ Rule 702 Motions shall take place on June 10,
2026.
Document(s) Filing Date
Plaintiff Reply ISO Class Certification
March 11, 2026	Plaintiff Rule 702 Motions
Plaintiff Opp. to Meta 702 Motions
Meta Replies ISO Rule 702 Motions April 14, 2026
Meta Opp. to Plaintiff Rule 702 Motions April 28, 2026
Plaintiff Replies ISO Rule 702 Motions May 26, 2026
ADR Deadline May 26, 2026
Hearing on Class Certification and Rule 702 Motions June 10, 2026
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:January 21, 2026 ____________________________________
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Court Judge
Case 3:22-cv-03580-WHO Document 1274 Filed 01/21/26 Page 3 of 3