1:10-ap-01040•Anderson v. Creekwood Capital LLC
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re NATALIE ANDERSON, No. 09-12574 Debtor(s). ______________________________________/ NATALIE ANDERSON, Plaintiff(s), v. A.P. No. 10-1040 CREEKWOOD CAPITAL, LLC, Defendant(s). _______________________________________/ Memorandum on Motion to Dismiss _________________ Plaintiff Natalie Anderson has filed a request for voluntary dismissal of the above adversary proceeding. Because both an answer and a motion for summary judgment have been filed by defendant, dismissal requires an order from the court which the court may condition on terms it considers proper. Rule 41(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.Proc., made applicable to bankruptcy adversary proceedings by Fed.R.Bankr.Proc. 7041. Defendant objects to dismissal because its summary judgment motion is pending, but has cited Entered on Docket June 11, 2010 GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case: 10-01040 Doc# 28 Filed: 06/11/10 Entered: 06/11/10 14:14:35 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 no case applying Rule 41(a)(2) to the situation. Defendant seems to think that there is some sort of automatic prejudice to it if it has to defend a second lawsuit, but that is not the case. Hamilton v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., 679 F.2d 143, 145 (9th Cir.1982). Defendant must show some prejudice to a legal interest, claim or argument. Westlands Water Dist. v. United States, 100 F.3d 94, 97 (9th Cir.1996). Defendant has made no such showing. Reliance on the court’s general equitable powers pursuant to § 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code is no substitute for thorough research and a cogent argument, based on applicable authority, as to why plaintiff ought not to be allowed to dismiss or why the dismissal ought to be conditioned. In the absence of a proper showing requiring the imposition of terms and conditions, plaintiff is entitled to a dismissal without conditions. 27A Fed.Proc.L.Ed., Pleadings and Motions, § 62:523. Defendant having failed to make such a showing, the request to dismiss will be granted without condition. Counsel for plaintiff shall submit an appropriate form of order. Dated: June 11, 2010 SAlan Jaroslovsky U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Case: 10-01040 Doc# 28 Filed: 06/11/10 Entered: 06/11/10 14:14:35 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.