USA v. Singh et al

1	O RDER SEALING D OCUMENTS A S SET FORTH I N
G OVERNMENT’ S N OTICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ERIC GRANT
United States Attorney
DAVID W. SPENCER
HADDY ABOUZEID
Assistant United States Attorneys
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: 	(916) 554-2900
Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMANDEEP MULTANI,
Defendant.
CASE NO. 2:21-cr-00078-JAM-3
ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET
FORTH IN GOVERNMENT’S NOTICE
Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in the government’s
Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the four-page document pertaining to defendant
Multani, and the government’s Request to Seal, shall be SEALED until further order of this Court.
It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government and
counsel for the defendant.
The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. District Court
for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in
the government’s request, sealing these documents serves a compelling interest. The Court further finds
that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interests identified by the government would be harmed.
In light of the public filing of its request to seal, the Court further finds that there are no additional
/ / /
/ / /

2	O RDER SEALING D OCUMENTS A S SET FORTH I N
G OVERNMENT’ S N OTICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
alternatives to sealing these documents that would adequately protect the compelling interests identified
by the government.
Dated: December 02, 2025