(PC) Dior v. Allison et al

1:21-cv-01282Caed05.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PETER NORTH DIOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 1:21-cv-01282-KES-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
(ECF No. 34)
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action.
On November 25, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable
claims, and granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 34.) Plaintiff has
not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court and the time to do so
has passed. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within
fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed
for failure to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a
recommendation to dismiss the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2026
STANLEY A. BOONE
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 1:21-cv-01282-KES-SAB Document 35 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.