2:98-bk-26952•Linda Jean Moca
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES DIVISION In re LINDA JEAN MOCA, Debtor. Case No. 2:98-bk-26952-RK Chapter 7 STATEMENT OF DECISION RE ORDER DENYING MOTION AND REQUESTS OF HRISTOS MOCA TO: (1) REOPEN CASE; (2) SET ASIDE SETTLEMENT ORDER; AND (3) REFUND SETTLEMENT PAYMENT By separate order, the court denied the renewed motion of creditor Hristos Moca (“creditor”) to reopen this bankruptcy case, to set aside a settlement order, and to refund a settlement payment, filed on December 20, 2012 (the “renewed motion”). In this statement of decision, the court explains its reasons for denying the renewed motion. Creditor brought a similar motion on January 25, 2012, seeking to bring a fraudulent transfer action against the debtor based on transfers that occurred in 1995, about 17 years ago. The court denied the original motion and issued a separate statement of decision explaining the ruling on March 29, 2012. See Bankruptcy Docket Nos. 154, 155. In the renewed motion, creditor raises one additional argument not raised in the original motion for why grounds exist under 11 U.S.C. § 350(b) to reopen the bankruptcy FILED & ENTERED JAN 25 2013 CLERK U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT Central District of California BY DEPUTY CLERK tatum Case 2:98-bk-26952-EC Doc 166 Filed 01/25/13 Entered 01/25/13 12:07:20 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3
2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 case. Creditor argues that the doctrine of equitable tolling applies, and that he should be allowed to bring an action for fraudulent transfer against the debtor, despite the seven- year statue of limitations provided in California Civil Code § 3439.09(c). Creditor, however, cannot prevail on this argument. The statute of limitations provided in California Civil Code § 3439.09(c) is an absolute bar against fraudulent transfer claims older than seven years and is thus a “statute of repose;” which may not be extended further under the doctrine of equitable tolling. In re JMC Telecom LLC, 416 B.R. 738, 744 (C.D. Cal. 2009) (holding that “[a]pplying equitable tolling would be inconsistent with a statute of repose, like § 3439.09(c), which sets a definitive outside limit on the amount of time to file a suit”); see also, Munoz v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 950, 957 (9th Cir. 2003)(“A statute of repose is a fixed, statutory cutoff date, usually independent of any variable, such as claimant’s awareness of a violation.”)(citation omitted). The creditor has not otherwise shown that there is any applicable equitable doctrine to except his claims from the statutory time bar of California Civil Code § 3439.09(c). Accordingly, the court concluded that creditor’s motion to reopen debtor’s bankruptcy case to bring a time-barred fraudulent transfer action against her should be denied. ### Date: January 25, 2013 Case 2:98-bk-26952-EC Doc 166 Filed 01/25/13 Entered 01/25/13 12:07:20 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 3
3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF ENTERED ORDER AND SERVICE LIST Notice is given by the court that a judgment or order entitled (specify) STATEMENT OF DECISION RE ORDER DENYING MOTION AND REQUESTS OF HRISTOS MOCA TO: (1) REOPEN CASE; (2) SET ASIDE SETTLEMENT ORDER; AND (3) REFUND SETTLEMENT PAYMENT was entered on the date indicated as “Entered” on the first page of this judgment or order and will be served in the manner indicated below: I. SERVED BY THE COURT VIA NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING (“NEF”) – Pursuant to controlling General Order(s) and Local Bankruptcy Rule(s), the foregoing document was served on the following person(s) by the court via NEF and hyperlink to the judgment or order. As of January 25, 2013, the following person(s) are currently on the Electronic Mail Notice List for this bankruptcy case or adversary proceeding to receive NEF transmission at the email address(es) indicated below: Enid M Colson emc@dgdk.com, ecolson@dgdk.com;DanningGill@gmail.com David A Gill (TR) mlr@dgdk.com, dgill@ecf.epiqsystems.com;DanningGill@Gmail.com Harriet L Goldfarb hlgoldfarb@yahoo.com United States Trustee (LA) ustpregion16.la.ecf@usdoj.gov Service information continued on attached page II. SERVED BY THE COURT VIA U.S. MAIL: A copy of this notice and a true copy of this judgment or order was sent by U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid, to the following person(s) and/or entity(ies) at the address(es) indicated below: Linda Jean Moca 232 N Mayflower Ave Monrovia, CA 91016 Hristos Moca 7050 Bertrand Ave Reseda, CA 91335 Service information continued on attached page III. TO BE SERVED BY THE LODGING PARTY: Within 72 hours after receipt of a copy of this judgment or order which bears an “Entered” stamp, the party lodging the judgment or order will serve a complete copy bearing an “Entered” stamp by U.S. Mail, overnight mail, facsimile transmission or email and file a proof of service of the entered order on the following person(s) and/or entity(ies) at the address(es), facsimile transmission number(s) and/or email address(es) indicated below: Service information continued on attached page Case 2:98-bk-26952-EC Doc 166 Filed 01/25/13 Entered 01/25/13 12:07:20 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 3
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.