White v. New York, City of et al

2:26-cv-00844Azd18.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Davon Chadewick White,
Plaintiff,
v.
City of New York, et al.,
Defendants.
No. CV-26-00844-PHX-KML
ORDER
The court dismissed this case for lack of jurisdiction on February 12, 2026. (Doc.
7.) That same day plaintiff filed a “Motion to Enter Redacted Tax Forms.” (Docs. 9, 10.)
And the following day plaintiff filed a “Motion to Vacate Dismissal.” (Doc. 11.) Because
this case is closed, there is no need for plaintiff to file copies of tax forms. Therefore, his
motion regarding tax forms is denied. Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the dismissal does not
identify any error in the court’s conclusion that it lacks personal jurisdiction over
defendants. Therefore, the motion to vacate dismissal is also denied.
Plaintiff should not file additional documents in this closed case except in
furtherance of an appeal.
/
/
/
/
/
Case 2:26-cv-00844-KML Document 12 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Enter Redacted Tax Forms (Doc. 10) is DENIED.
The documents at Doc. 10 shall be filed on the public docket.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion to Vacate Dismissal (Doc. 11) is
DENIED.
Dated this 18th day of February, 2026.
Case 2:26-cv-00844-KML Document 12 Filed 02/18/26 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.