Russell v. McMurry

6:25-cv-06099Arwd07.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
ERIC DEMOND RUSSELL 	PLAINTIFF
V. 	CASE NO. 6:25-CV-6099
WAYNE MCMURRY 	DEFENDANT
ORDER
Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) of the
Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas. On March 13, 2026, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the
Court’s order of dismissal and directed the Clerk to mail him a copy of the Report and
Recommendation at his new address. He was granted twenty-one additional days to file
objections. The deadline has now passed, and no objections were filed.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds
that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED
IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted. Plaintiff is warned that, in the future, this dismissal may be counted as a strike
for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and thus, the Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g)
strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 7th day of April, 2026.
/s/ Timothy L. Brooks
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 6:25-cv-06099-TLB Document 22 Filed 04/07/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.